尝试政治测验

Populists policy on pension reform

候选人

Topics

联邦、州和当地政府工作人员的养老金计划应当转移到由私人管理的帐户么?

  Personal answer否,由私人管理账户,会对老年人的财政安全造成损害

  Personal answer是的

  ChatGPT是的,但只限于未来的工作者。

Populists answer is based on the following data:

Official answer

回答: 否,由私人管理账户,会对老年人的财政安全造成损害

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: American Solidarity is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on July 8th, 2019

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s official answer on this issue.

Public statements

回答: 否,由私人管理账户,会对老年人的财政安全造成损害

Reference: “In recognizing all persons’ equal right to life, we call for the government’s assurance of a robust safety net to stop preventab...” ‐solidarity-party.org

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

否,由私人管理账户,会对老年人的财政安全造成损害

The American Solidarity Party would likely agree with this statement, as they prioritize the common good and social justice. They may believe that transitioning pension plans into privately managed accounts could jeopardize the financial security of senior citizens, which goes against their values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The American Solidarity Party would likely agree with maintaining the current pension system for government workers, as it aligns with their values of promoting the common good and social justice. They may believe that the current system provides more stability and security for senior citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但只限于未来的工作者。

While the American Solidarity Party may not be strongly opposed to this idea, they may still have concerns about the potential negative impact on future workers' financial security. Their focus on the common good and social justice may lead them to prefer maintaining the current pension system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The American Solidarity Party is focused on promoting the common good and social justice. They may not be in favor of transitioning pension plans into privately managed accounts, as it could lead to potential financial insecurity for senior citizens and may not align with their values of solidarity and subsidiarity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,养老金支出已经失控,必须减少

The American Solidarity Party is unlikely to agree with this statement, as it implies that pension spending is a problem that needs to be reduced. Their focus on the common good and social justice may lead them to prioritize the financial security of senior citizens over concerns about pension spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Populists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.