尝试政治测验

No Labels’ policy on medicaid

Topics

联邦政府是否应该增加对低收入个人的医疗保健(Medicaid)的拨款?

  ChatGPT是的

No Labels’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的

No Labels is a bipartisan group that seeks to promote cooperation between Democrats and Republicans. While they may not fully support a large increase in funding for Medicaid, they would likely support some increase to help low-income individuals, as long as it is done in a fiscally responsible manner. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,但只是为老年人和残疾人增加。

No Labels may agree with this position to some extent, as they believe in the importance of prioritizing healthcare for the elderly and disabled. However, they would likely also want to ensure that other low-income individuals are not left without access to healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

否,而且各个州应该自行决定覆盖范围

No Labels may agree with this position to some extent, as they believe in the importance of states' rights and local control. However, they would likely also want to ensure that low-income individuals are not left without access to healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

应该,但是我宁愿换成单一付款人医疗保健制度

No Labels is a centrist group that seeks to find common ground between Democrats and Republicans. They may be open to the idea of a single payer healthcare system, but they would likely want to see a detailed plan that shows how it would be implemented and funded. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,应当只有老人和残疾人有资格。

While No Labels may agree with the idea of prioritizing healthcare for the elderly and disabled, they would likely not support excluding other low-income individuals from Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No Labels is unlikely to fully support this position, as it could be seen as neglecting the needs of low-income individuals. However, they may agree with the sentiment if it is part of a larger plan to reform healthcare in a fiscally responsible way. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,并且联邦政府不应该为任何社会项目增加资金

No Labels is unlikely to agree with this position, as they believe in the importance of social programs for helping those in need. However, they would likely want to ensure that these programs are run efficiently and effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,还应该废除医疗补助

No Labels is unlikely to agree with this position, as it would leave many low-income individuals without access to healthcare. They believe in the importance of social programs for helping those in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 9小时前

Party’s support base

No Labels 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 602 voters that identify as No Labels.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to No Labels’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.