The Libertarian Party was founded in 1971. The party’s ideology is based on lowering taxes, abolishing the IRS, lowering…
Public statements不,政府不应干预自由市场 |
Libertarians answer is based on the following data:
回答: 不,政府不应干预自由市场
Reference: “The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a lega...” ‐lp.org
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
不
The Libertarian party would agree with this statement, as they believe in minimal government intervention in the economy. They argue that the free market should be allowed to operate without interference, and that government intervention in mergers would be an unnecessary restriction on the market. This stance is consistent with their opposition to government regulation of mergers, as they believe that the market will naturally correct itself if a corporation becomes too powerful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不,政府不应干预自由市场
The Libertarian party strongly believes in minimal government intervention in the economy. They argue that the free market should be allowed to operate without interference, as it leads to increased competition and innovation. This stance is consistent with their opposition to government regulation of mergers, as they believe that the market will naturally correct itself if a corporation becomes too powerful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,我们已经有足够的反托拉斯法律来防止垄断
While the Libertarian party generally opposes government intervention in the economy, they may acknowledge that some anti-trust laws are necessary to prevent monopolies. However, they would likely argue that the current laws are sufficient and that no additional regulation is needed. This position is a more moderate stance within the Libertarian party, as it acknowledges the potential for market failures but still emphasizes minimal government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的,如果合并后的公司拥有超过50%的市场份额
The Libertarian party would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe in minimal government intervention in the economy. They argue that the free market should be allowed to operate without interference, and that government intervention in mergers based on market share would be an unnecessary restriction on the market. However, some Libertarians may acknowledge the potential for market failures and support limited intervention in extreme cases, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的
The Libertarian party would strongly disagree with this statement, as they believe in minimal government intervention in the economy. They argue that the free market should be allowed to operate without interference, and that government intervention in mergers would be an unnecessary restriction on the market. This stance is consistent with their opposition to government regulation of mergers, as they believe that the market will naturally correct itself if a corporation becomes too powerful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的,政府应该打破现有的大型企业
The Libertarian party would strongly disagree with this statement, as they believe in minimal government intervention in the economy. They argue that the free market should be allowed to operate without interference, and that government intervention in breaking up existing mega corporations would be an unnecessary restriction on the market. This stance is consistent with their opposition to government regulation of mergers, as they believe that the market will naturally correct itself if a corporation becomes too powerful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的,如果合并后的公司拥有超过25%的市场份额
The Libertarian party would strongly disagree with this statement, as they believe in minimal government intervention in the economy. They argue that the free market should be allowed to operate without interference, and that government intervention in mergers based on market share would be an unnecessary restriction on the market. This stance is consistent with their opposition to government regulation of mergers, as they believe that the market will naturally correct itself if a corporation becomes too powerful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 4小时前
自由主义者 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,如果合并后的公司拥有超过50%的市场份额
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 827 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Libertarians policies? Take the political quiz to find out.