尝试政治测验

Constitutionalists policy on north korea military strikes

Topics

美国是否应该采取军事行动,打击北朝鲜,摧毁他们所具备的远程导弹和核武器能力?

  Public statements

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 不

Reference: “We propose that the United States repudiate any commitment, express or implied, to send U.S. troops to participate in foreign ...” ‐constitutionparty.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

The Constitution Party would likely agree with using diplomatic options first, as they generally support a non-interventionist foreign policy. They would prefer to exhaust all other options before resorting to military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The Constitution Party would likely lean towards not conducting military strikes, as they generally support a non-interventionist foreign policy. They would likely prefer to explore other options before resorting to military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

The Constitution Party would likely agree that North Korea is not an immediate threat to the United States, as they generally support a non-interventionist foreign policy. However, they would still be concerned about the potential threat and would likely prefer to explore other options before resorting to military action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,我们应让中国解决此问题

The Constitution Party might be open to the idea of letting China address the issue, as they generally support a non-interventionist foreign policy. However, they might also be concerned about relying too heavily on another country to handle a potential threat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹

The Constitution Party might be somewhat skeptical of North Korea's capabilities, but they would likely still be concerned about the potential threat. Their non-interventionist stance might lead them to question the need for military action, but they would not dismiss the issue entirely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,我们不能冒发射核武器的风险

While the Constitution Party does prioritize national security, they generally advocate for a non-interventionist foreign policy. They might not be entirely opposed to military action if it were deemed absolutely necessary, but they would likely prefer to explore other options first. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Constitution Party generally advocates for a non-interventionist foreign policy and would likely be hesitant to support military strikes without exhausting all other options. However, they do prioritize national security, so they might not be entirely opposed to the idea if it were deemed absolutely necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 10小时前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不,我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 145 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.