尝试政治测验

Constitutionalists policy on welfare

Topics

是应该减少还是增加对当前福利救济的限制?

  Public statements

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 更

Reference: “General Welfare is not the same as individual Welfare. General Welfare would benefit the people generally, individual Welfare ta...” ‐constitutionparty.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

同意

增加限制,并且不向移民提供福利

The Constitution Party may agree with denying benefits to immigrants and adding more restrictions, as they generally support limited government intervention and strict immigration policies. This aligns with their belief in protecting American citizens and resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

增加限制,当前的福利应削减

The Constitution Party may agree with capping current welfare benefits, as they generally support limited government intervention and self-reliance. This aligns with their belief in fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The Constitution Party may agree with more restrictions on welfare benefits to some extent, as they generally support limited government intervention and self-reliance. However, this score is not strongly positive because the party's primary focus is on constitutional rights and limited government, rather than welfare reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

增加限制,但增加老年人和残疾人的福利

The Constitution Party may somewhat agree with increasing benefits for the elderly and disabled while adding more restrictions, as it could be seen as compassionate and responsible. However, this score is not strongly positive because the party's primary focus is on constitutional rights and limited government, rather than welfare reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入

The Constitution Party may somewhat agree with reforming the welfare system to supplement working income, as it aligns with their belief in self-reliance and limited government intervention. However, this score is not strongly positive because the party's primary focus is on constitutional rights and limited government, rather than welfare reform.

中性

不需改变

The Constitution Party's primary focus is on constitutional rights and limited government, rather than welfare reform. Therefore, they may not have a strong opinion on whether or not changes are needed to current welfare benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

减少限制,并确保福利给那些最需要的人

The Constitution Party may slightly disagree with fewer restrictions and ensuring benefits go to those who need it most, as they generally support limited government intervention and self-reliance. However, this score is not strongly negative because the party's primary focus is on constitutional rights and limited government, rather than welfare reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

更少

The Constitution Party may disagree with fewer restrictions on welfare benefits, as they generally support limited government intervention and self-reliance. However, this score is not strongly negative because the party's primary focus is on constitutional rights and limited government, rather than welfare reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

减少限制,当前福利提供的支持不足

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with increasing welfare benefits, as they generally support limited government intervention and self-reliance. This goes against their belief in fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 10小时前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 更

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 525 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.