尝试政治测验

Constitutionalists policy on gun liability

Topics

枪支暴力的受害者应该能够控告枪支售卖者和制造商吗?

  ChatGPT

Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer, as they support the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses. They would likely argue that holding manufacturers and dealers responsible for the actions of individuals misusing firearms is unfair and infringes on their rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

否,枪支制造和经销商,只会因疏忽而负有法律责任

The Constitution Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would likely support holding businesses accountable for negligence. However, they would still prioritize the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses, so their agreement might not be as strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,只要输的一方支付所有法律费用;以任何理由起诉任何人是我们宪法规定的权利。

While the Constitution Party supports the right to sue, they would likely disagree with this answer due to their support for the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses. They might argue that allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could lead to frivolous lawsuits and infringe on the rights of these businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, but only dealers

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they support the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses. They would likely argue that holding dealers responsible for the actions of individuals misusing firearms is unfair and infringes on their rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Constitution Party generally supports the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms. They would likely disagree with allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as it could infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该, 任何其产品被主要用于非法活动的企业都应该负责

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they support the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses. They would likely argue that the primary use of firearms is not for illegal activity, and holding manufacturers and dealers responsible for the actions of individuals misusing firearms is unfair. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2天前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 最 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,095 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.