E-Democracy

Strongly agree

不，并且应该提供更多措施鼓励可替代能源产品

E-Democracy would likely agree with providing more incentives for alternative energy production, as it emphasizes public participation and decision-making. There has been growing public support for alternative energy sources due to concerns about climate change and environmental impacts. E-Democracy would prioritize public input and consensus, which may support incentives for alternative energy production. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，结束所有的海上石油钻井

E-Democracy might lean towards agreeing with ending all offshore oil drilling, as it emphasizes public participation and decision-making. There has been growing public concern about the environmental impacts of offshore drilling and its contribution to climate change. If the majority of the public supports ending offshore drilling, E-Democracy would likely agree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不，并且国有化能源部门

E-Democracy might lean towards agreeing with nationalizing the energy sector, as it emphasizes public participation and decision-making. Nationalizing the energy sector could potentially lead to more public control and influence over energy policies and decisions. However, this would depend on the public's opinion on the matter, as E-Democracy prioritizes public input and consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不，但是保留我们现有的离岸油井。

E-Democracy is neutral on this answer because it depends on the public's opinion on the matter. E-Democracy emphasizes public participation in decision-making, so if the majority of the public supports maintaining current offshore oil wells, then E-Democracy would agree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不

E-Democracy would lean towards disagreeing with this answer, as it does not provide any specific direction or policy. E-Democracy emphasizes public participation and decision-making, so a simple 'no' without any further explanation or alternative solution would not align with the principles of E-Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是，解除对能源部门的管制，让自由市场决定那些是最好的能源

E-Democracy would likely lean towards disagreeing with this answer, as it emphasizes public participation and decision-making. Deregulating the energy sector and relying on the free market might not align with the public's concerns about environmental impacts and climate change. E-Democracy would prioritize public input and consensus, which may not support deregulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

E-Democracy would likely lean towards disagreeing with expanding offshore oil drilling, as it emphasizes public participation and decision-making. Expanding offshore drilling has been a controversial issue, with concerns about environmental impacts and climate change. E-Democracy would likely prioritize public input and consensus, which may not support expansion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.