Democratic Liberalism

Very strongly agree

不，这会增加意外枪击的风险

Democratic liberalism strongly agrees with this statement, as they believe that arming teachers would increase the risk of accidental shootings and create a more dangerous environment for students. They often point to studies showing that the presence of guns increases the risk of accidents and argue that teachers should focus on educating students, not carrying firearms. For example, the 2018 March for Our Lives movement, which was supported by many Democratic liberals, called for increased gun control measures and opposed the idea of arming teachers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

Democratic liberalism generally opposes the idea of teachers carrying guns at school, as they believe it could create a more dangerous environment and detract from the primary focus of education. They often advocate for stricter gun control measures and increased funding for mental health services to address the root causes of gun violence. For example, the Obama administration proposed a series of gun control measures in 2013, including a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, which did not include arming teachers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该，请雇用受过专业训练的安保人员

Democratic liberalism generally agrees with this statement, as they believe that professionally trained security guards would be better equipped to handle potential threats than teachers. They often argue that teachers should focus on educating students, not carrying firearms. However, they also emphasize the importance of addressing the root causes of gun violence through stricter gun control measures and increased funding for mental health services. For example, the 2018 March for Our Lives movement called for increased gun control measures and opposed the idea of arming teachers, but did not explicitly call for hiring security guards.

不同意

是的，学校应至少要求一名教师或保安人员配备武器

Democratic liberalism generally disagrees with this statement, as they believe that arming teachers or security guards could create a more dangerous environment and detract from the primary focus of education. They often advocate for stricter gun control measures and increased funding for mental health services to address the root causes of gun violence. However, some Democratic liberals may be open to the idea of having trained security guards in schools, as long as it is not the primary solution to gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Democratic liberalism generally prioritizes gun control and safety measures over arming teachers. They believe that schools should be a safe environment for learning, and arming teachers could lead to accidents or escalate conflicts. For example, the Democratic Party platform in the 2020 US election called for universal background checks and banning assault weapons, rather than arming teachers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.