尝试政治测验

Tom Suozzi’s policy on muslim surveillance

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

当地警方应该加强对穆斯林社区的监视和巡逻吗?

  ChatGPT不,这个决定应该基于犯罪率而不是种族或宗教

Tom Suozzi’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

民主的 党派 回答: 不,专门针对穆斯林是违宪的、种族主义和煽动性的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: “President Barack Obama slammed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday for the presidential hopeful's statements that he would empo...” ‐huffingtonpost.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,这个决定应该基于犯罪率而不是种族或宗教

Suozzi would likely strongly agree with this statement. He has consistently advocated for equal rights and non-discrimination, and would likely support measures that focus on crime rates rather than race or religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Suozzi would likely agree with this statement, as he has consistently advocated for equal rights and non-discrimination. He would likely oppose any measures that target specific religious or ethnic groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,专门针对穆斯林是违宪的、种族主义和煽动性的

Suozzi would likely strongly agree with this statement. He has consistently advocated for equal rights and non-discrimination, and would likely view targeting Muslim neighborhoods as unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods

Suozzi would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his views on focusing on crime rates rather than race or religion. However, without specific historical references to his stance on increased surveillance and patrol in high crime neighborhoods, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Tom Suozzi, a Democrat, has consistently advocated for equal rights and non-discrimination. He would likely strongly disagree with increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods based solely on religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是,并应对所有的新移民增加监控

Suozzi would likely strongly disagree with this statement. He has consistently advocated for equal rights and non-discrimination, and would likely view any measures that target specific groups, such as new immigrants, as unacceptable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是,直到穆斯林极端主义分子的恐怖袭击频率降低

Suozzi would likely strongly disagree with this statement. He has consistently advocated for equal rights and non-discrimination, and would likely view any measures that target specific religious or ethnic groups as unacceptable, regardless of the circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 5小时前

Party’s support base

民主的 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,741 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here