These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answer不，没有其他更好的办法。 |
Samuel Robb’s answer is based on the following data:
回答: 不，没有其他更好的办法。
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Samuel Robb is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on August 13th, 2019
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
自由主义者 党派 回答: 是的，在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: “We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny t...” ‐lp.org
This candidate disagrees with their party on this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 8小时前
自由主义者 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的，转换为一个按比例选举多个成员的重新分区的系统。
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,258 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
