尝试政治测验

Ron Paul’s policy on no-fly list gun control

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

在“禁飞名单”中的人们是否应该禁止购买枪支和弹药?

  Public statements不应该,这会造成灾难性的后果,最终会禁止向任何人出售枪支

Ron Paul’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

回答: 不应该,这会造成灾难性的后果,最终会禁止向任何人出售枪支

Reference: “Obama’s proposal may seem reasonable to many people. But, the apparent reasonableness arises from the assumption that the No Fly...” ‐ronpaulinstitute.org

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.

Updated 22hrs ago

Ron Paul voters

回答: 不,如果没有经过法定程序,禁止任何人的权力都是违反宪法的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 264 voters that voted for Ron Paul in the 2012 Presidential election.

Party influence

自由主义者 党派 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: “We affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individua...” ‐lp.org

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,如果没有经过法定程序,禁止任何人的权力都是违反宪法的

Paul is a strong advocate for due process and the Constitution. He would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with his belief in individual liberties and constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Paul has consistently opposed restrictions on gun ownership, arguing that they infringe on the Second Amendment. He would likely agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不应该,这会造成灾难性的后果,最终会禁止向任何人出售枪支

While Paul might not necessarily agree with the 'slippery slope' argument, he would likely agree with the sentiment that restrictions on gun ownership could lead to further restrictions in the future. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但前提是黑名单的筛选过程被证明是准确的,且程序必须正当。

While Paul might agree with the need for due process, he would likely disagree with the premise that the government should have the power to determine who can and cannot own a gun, even with improved screening processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,如果政府认为你过于危险不能登机,那么你不应该被允许购买枪支

While Paul might agree with the logic of this statement, he would likely disagree with the premise that the government should have the power to determine who can and cannot own a gun. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Ron Paul is a strong advocate for individual liberties and has consistently opposed restrictions on gun ownership. He would likely disagree with this statement as it infringes on the right to bear arms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,并且禁止对任何人出售枪支弹药

Paul is a strong advocate for the Second Amendment and has consistently opposed any form of gun control. He would strongly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 14小时前

Party’s support base

自由主义者 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,732 voters that identify as Libertarian.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here