尝试政治测验

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s policy on nuclear energy

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

您是否支持使用核能?

  Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbase是的,只要没有政府补贴

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 9小时前

Michael Anthony Peroutka voters

回答: 是的,只要没有政府补贴

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 104 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.

Party influence

宪法 》 党派 回答: 是的

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: “"Private property rights should be respected, and the federal government should not interfere with the development of potential ...” ‐constitutionparty.com

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的,只要没有政府补贴

Peroutka's political philosophy aligns with this answer. He would likely support the use of nuclear energy as long as it's not subsidized by the government, in line with his belief in limited government and free-market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,暂时性的,同时我们增加投资到更清洁的可再生能源

This answer aligns with Peroutka's political philosophy. He would likely support the temporary use of nuclear energy while cleaner renewable alternatives are developed, as long as this process is managed by the private sector without government interference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热

Peroutka might agree with this answer to some extent. While he would likely support the development of cleaner energy alternatives, he would probably prefer these to be developed and managed by the private sector without government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, generally supports free-market solutions and less government intervention. While he might not be opposed to nuclear energy, he would likely prefer it to be developed and managed by the private sector without government interference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

There's no evidence to suggest that Peroutka would be against the use of nuclear energy. His political stance would likely be more about how it's managed and regulated rather than outright opposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,但是需要政府补助

Peroutka would likely disagree with this answer. As a Constitution Party candidate, he generally opposes government subsidies and intervention in the economy, preferring free-market solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,并且使这一工业国有化

Peroutka would strongly disagree with this answer. His political philosophy is rooted in limited government and free-market principles, so he would be opposed to the nationalization of any industry, including nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2小时前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 11,303 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here