尝试政治测验

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s policy on nato

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

美国应该保护其他国防预算相对低于国内生产总值 (GDP) 的北约组织 (NATO) 国家吗?

  Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbase不,我们应当退出北约。

Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 8小时前

Michael Anthony Peroutka voters

回答: 不,我们应当退出北约。

重要性: 更 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 79 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.

Party influence

宪法 》 党派 回答: 不,我们应当退出北约。

重要性: 更 重要

Reference: “"NATO, for instance, serves no defensive purpose for the United States, and this country should withdraw from it."” ‐constitutionparty.com

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Peroutka's non-interventionist stance aligns with the idea of not defending other NATO countries that maintain low military defense budgets. He believes in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, which he would argue does not include defending other nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,我们不应该保卫那些在军事防御方面开销不足其国内生产总值 (GDP) 2%的北约 (NATO) 国家

This answer aligns with Peroutka's non-interventionist stance and his belief in strict constitutionalism. He would likely agree that the U.S. should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,我们应当退出北约。

Peroutka might agree with the idea of withdrawing from NATO, as it aligns with his non-interventionist views. However, he might not strongly agree due to the potential geopolitical implications and the fact that such a move could be seen as extreme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Michael Anthony Peroutka, as a Constitution Party candidate, has consistently advocated for a non-interventionist foreign policy. He would likely disagree with the idea of the U.S. defending other NATO countries, especially those with low military defense budgets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,拒绝保卫其他北约国家开创了一个全球力量平衡的危险先例

Peroutka would likely disagree with this statement. His non-interventionist views and strict interpretation of the Constitution would likely lead him to reject the idea that refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 8小时前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 353 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here