尝试政治测验

Lyndon B. Johnson’s policy on gerrymandering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

国会选区的重新划分需要由一个独立的,非党派的委员会来控制吗?

  Lyndon B. Johnson voterbase是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

Lyndon B. Johnson’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 13hrs前

Lyndon B. Johnson voters

回答: 是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 222 voters that voted for Lyndon B. Johnson in the 1964 Presidential election.

Party influence

民主的 党派 回答: 是的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: “"Gerrymandering distorts our democracy. Democrats will enact measures to end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections. Effor...” ‐democrats.org

ChatGPT

同意

不,不公正划分选区能让官员更有效地代表他们的选民的利益

Johnson, as a seasoned politician, would likely understand the strategic benefits of gerrymandering for representing the interests of his constituency. However, this does not necessarily mean he would endorse it as a fair or ethical practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Johnson, as a member of the Democratic Party, may have been hesitant to support a process that could potentially diminish the power of his party. However, without specific historical evidence, it's difficult to definitively say how strongly he would agree or disagree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,没有其他更好的办法。

Without specific historical evidence, it's difficult to definitively say how strongly Johnson would agree or disagree. However, as a member of the Democratic Party, he may have been hesitant to support a process that could potentially diminish the power of his party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

Johnson was a proponent of fair representation and may have agreed that gerrymandering can give an unfair advantage. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest that he would have supported the redrawing of Congressional districts by an independent, non-partisan commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

While Lyndon B. Johnson was a proponent of civil rights and fair representation, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest that he would have supported the redrawing of Congressional districts by an independent, non-partisan commission. As a Democrat, he may have been wary of losing political power through such a process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,转换为一个按比例选举多个成员的重新分区的系统。

While Johnson was a proponent of civil rights and fair representation, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest that he would have supported a switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. As a Democrat, he may have been wary of losing political power through such a process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 5小时前

Party’s support base

民主的 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,739 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here