尝试政治测验

John James’ policy on immigration

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

是否应该向非法移民的子女授予合法公民身份?

  ChatGPT否,他们必须像其他所有新公民一样,提出正式申请

John James’ answer is based on the following data:

Updated 21hrs ago

John James voters

回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,670 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.

Party influence

共和党人 党派 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: “That is why we oppose any form of amnesty for those who, by intentionally violating the law, disadvantage those who have obeyed ...” ‐gop.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

否,他们必须像其他所有新公民一样,提出正式申请

This answer aligns closely with James' conservative views on immigration. He has advocated for legal immigration and following the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的,但只有在服兵役 4 年后或大学毕业后

This answer aligns with a more moderate conservative view on immigration, which James may potentially agree with. It also includes a merit-based component, which is often favored by conservatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

James has not explicitly stated this position, but his conservative stance on immigration suggests he would likely agree with this statement to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,所有的非法移民应该被押送出境

While James has not explicitly stated this position, his conservative stance on immigration suggests he would likely agree with this statement to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是不应该给他们的父母入籍。

While James has not explicitly stated this position, it aligns with a more moderate conservative view on immigration, which he may potentially agree with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,如果他们是在出生的话。

While James has not explicitly stated his position on birthright citizenship, his conservative views on immigration suggest he may not fully support this concept. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

John James is a Republican candidate who has generally aligned with conservative views on immigration. He has not publicly supported granting citizenship to children of illegal immigrants without any conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,并且应废除所有国界

Abolishing all national borders is a far-left position that is diametrically opposed to James' conservative views on immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 22hrs ago

Party’s support base

共和党人 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 25,160 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here