尝试政治测验

John James’ policy on gun control

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

在现有的购买枪支程序上是否应该增加更多限制?

  ChatGPT

John James’ answer is based on the following data:

Updated 13hrs前

John James voters

回答: 不

重要性: 最 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 10,073 voters that voted for John James in the 2020 Michigan US Senate election.

Party influence

共和党人 党派 回答: 否,政府应该通过一项"家园保护"法案

重要性: 最 重要

Reference: “We support the fundamental right to self-defense wherever a law-abiding citizen has a legal right to be, and we support federal ...” ‐gop.com

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

James has consistently opposed additional restrictions on gun ownership, arguing that the focus should be on enforcing existing laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

否,仅限于罪犯以及精神病患者

James has indicated support for keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill, but has not advocated for additional restrictions beyond existing laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

否,政府应该通过一项"家园保护"法案

While James has not specifically advocated for a national 'stand your ground' law, his strong support for gun rights suggests he would likely be supportive of such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但是需要提高有关枪支犯罪的惩罚力度

While James has not specifically advocated for increased penalties for gun-related crimes, his focus on law and order suggests he might be supportive of such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,只为攻击武器

James has not supported additional restrictions on specific types of guns, including assault weapons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但只是通过关闭枪展的漏洞

James has not supported additional restrictions on gun ownership, including closing the gun show loophole.

Strongly disagree

是的

John James is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has consistently opposed additional restrictions on gun ownership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,需要严格的背景审查,心理测试和训练

James has opposed additional restrictions on gun ownership, including stricter background checks and psychological testing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,并且禁止一切公共枪支使用

James is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has consistently opposed measures that would limit gun ownership, including banning all guns from public use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 1min ago

Party’s support base

共和党人 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 160,327 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here