尝试政治测验

John James’ policy on drug policy

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

你是否支持将药物使用列为非犯罪行为?

  ChatGPT不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度

John James’ answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

共和党人 党派 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: “Republicans vote to block Washington, D.C.'s new marijuana decriminalization law” ‐drugpolicy.org

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度

James' conservative values and emphasis on law and order suggest he would likely support increased punishment for drug dealers. However, he has not made explicit statements on this issue, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

James' conservative values and emphasis on law and order suggest he would not support decriminalizing drug use. However, he has not made explicit statements on this issue, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法

While James has not explicitly called for tougher drug laws, his conservative values and emphasis on law and order suggest he might support this. However, without explicit statements, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入

While James has not explicitly advocated for increased funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation, his emphasis on community and family values suggest he might support this. However, without explicit statements, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化

James has not publicly supported the decriminalization of any drugs, even those with medicinal benefits. However, his conservative values might allow for some flexibility on this issue, so the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是,对大多数但不是所有毒品

James has not publicly supported the decriminalization of any drugs, suggesting he would likely disagree with this. However, without explicit statements, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

John James is a conservative Republican who has not publicly advocated for the decriminalization of drug use. His stance on law and order and traditional conservative values suggest he would not support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决

James has not publicly supported retroactively reducing sentences for those already serving time for drug offenses. His conservative stance and emphasis on law and order suggest he would strongly disagree with this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 18小时前

Party’s support base

共和党人 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 21,768 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here