Jo Jorgensen

Very strongly agree

不，我们必须首先使用每一种外交斡旋

This answer aligns with Jorgensen's belief in diplomacy and non-interventionism. She has consistently advocated for diplomatic solutions over military actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不

Jorgensen's stance aligns with this answer as she believes in non-interventionism and prefers diplomatic solutions over military actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, North Korea is not an immediate threat to our country

This answer aligns with Jorgensen's belief that the U.S. should not engage in military actions unless directly threatened. However, she might not fully agree with the assertion that North Korea is not an immediate threat, as it is a complex issue with many variables. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该，我们应让中国解决此问题

While Jorgensen believes in non-interventionism, she also supports the idea of other countries taking responsibility for their regional issues. However, she might not fully agree with the idea of 'letting' another country handle the situation, as it implies a level of U.S. control or influence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，我不相信朝鲜拥有或有能力发展远程核导弹

Jorgensen might somewhat agree with this answer, as it aligns with her non-interventionist stance. However, she has not publicly expressed doubt about North Korea's nuclear capabilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Jo Jorgensen, as a Libertarian candidate, strongly advocates for non-interventionist foreign policy. She believes that the U.S. should not engage in military actions unless directly attacked. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该，我们不能冒发射核武器的风险

Jorgensen would likely disagree with this answer as it suggests a preemptive strike, which goes against her non-interventionist beliefs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.