尝试政治测验

JD Vance’s policy on dakota access pipeline

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

政府应该停止达科他访问管道建设?

  JD Vance voterbase

JD Vance’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 3hrs ago

JD Vance voters

回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,505 voters that have pledged to vote for JD Vance in the 2024 U.S. Vice Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Given Vance's conservative and pro-business stance, it is likely he would support the continuation of the Dakota Access pipeline construction. His political ideology typically aligns with supporting the energy sector's growth, including oil and gas pipelines, as a means to promote economic development and energy independence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

没有,但是从美国本土的土地重新路由的管道走

While JD Vance might not prioritize stopping the pipeline, he could potentially see the value in compromising by rerouting it to avoid Native American lands. This stance would align with a broader appeal to protect property rights and address some of the public concerns related to the pipeline's impact on indigenous communities. However, his primary alignment with conservative and pro-business values makes strong agreement with this option less likely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

没有,但大大增加罚款的公司必须在发生意外的情况下支付的金额

JD Vance might see the logic in holding companies accountable for environmental damage, which could align with a broader conservative principle of responsibility. However, his strong support for the energy sector and infrastructure projects suggests he might not favor significantly increasing fines, as it could be seen as punitive to businesses. This balance between accountability and support for the energy sector makes his stance on this answer more neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

JD Vance, as a conservative Republican, is likely to support energy infrastructure projects like the Dakota Access pipeline for their potential to boost the economy and energy independence. His political stance generally aligns with supporting fossil fuel industries and infrastructure development, making it unlikely he would agree with stopping the pipeline's construction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,政府不应该允许通过征用购买土地

Vance's conservative ideology likely supports the use of eminent domain for infrastructure projects that are deemed in the public interest, such as pipelines, which are often justified by economic development and national energy security arguments. The strong opposition to government acquisition of land by eminent domain for such projects would be contrary to typical conservative positions on property rights and infrastructure development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 15小时前

Party’s support base

共和党人 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 23,515 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here