尝试政治测验

George C. Wallace’s policy on world health organization

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

  George C. Wallace voterbaseNo, fund national and local programs instead

George C. Wallace’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 8小时前

George C. Wallace voters

回答: No, fund national and local programs instead

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 84 voters that voted for George C. Wallace in the 1968 Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, fund national and local programs instead

Wallace was a strong advocate for states' rights and local control. He would likely strongly agree with the idea of funding national and local programs instead of an international organization like the World Health Organization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Wallace's political philosophy was rooted in states' rights and local control. He would likely support the idea of not funding an international organization like the World Health Organization, preferring to focus on domestic issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, it has shown to be ineffective

Wallace might agree with this statement, as he was generally skeptical of international organizations and their effectiveness. He would likely prefer that resources be directed towards domestic issues and local control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

While Wallace would likely be skeptical of funding the WHO, he might not be completely opposed if the funding was decreased. His focus was more on domestic issues and states' rights, so he might see a decreased funding as a compromise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

This answer is a bit of a compromise, which Wallace might be open to. However, his general skepticism of international organizations and preference for states' rights and local control might make him hesitant to agree fully. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

George C. Wallace was a staunch states' rights advocate and often opposed federal and international intervention. He would likely be skeptical of the government funding an international organization like the World Health Organization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and increase the amount

Given Wallace's focus on states' rights and local control, he would likely strongly disagree with increasing funding to an international organization like the World Health Organization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 8小时前

Party’s support base

美国 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,682 voters that identify as American.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here