尝试政治测验

Elise Stefanik’s policy on obamacare

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

你支持患者保护和平价医疗法案(奥巴马医改)吗?

  ChatGPT

Elise Stefanik’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 7hrs ago

Elise Stefanik voters

回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 889 voters that voted for Elise Stefanik in the 2020 New York District 21 US House of Representatives election.

Party influence

共和党人 党派 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: “The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act – Obamacare – was never really about healthcare, though its impact upon the natio...” ‐gop.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Stefanik has been a vocal critic of the Affordable Care Act, voting multiple times to repeal it. She has argued that it has led to increased healthcare costs and decreased choice for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不支持,应开放市场,让保险公司跨州竞争以降低成本

While Stefanik has not specifically advocated for opening the markets so insurers can compete across state lines, she has expressed support for free-market healthcare solutions and has criticized the Affordable Care Act for limiting competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,政府不应该参与到医疗中来

Stefanik has criticized the Affordable Care Act for expanding government control over healthcare and has advocated for free-market solutions. However, she has not explicitly stated that the government should not be involved in healthcare at all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,而且允许顾客选择医疗提供方并且从其它国家进口药物

While Stefanik has advocated for free-market healthcare solutions, she has not specifically advocated for allowing consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries. However, these ideas are not necessarily inconsistent with her general support for free-market solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,我支持该计划的大概内容,但不支持每一部分

While Stefanik may agree with some aspects of the Affordable Care Act, she has consistently voted against it and has advocated for its repeal. She has argued that it has led to higher costs and less choice for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Elise Stefanik has consistently voted against the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and has advocated for its repeal. She has stated that she believes it has led to higher costs and less choice for consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

支持,但是一个强制唯一的医疗支付者系统会更好。

Stefanik has consistently opposed government-run healthcare and has criticized the Affordable Care Act for expanding government control over healthcare. She would likely strongly disagree with a mandatory single payer system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 37mins ago

Party’s support base

共和党人 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 143,370 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here