尝试政治测验

David Kustoff’s policy on gerrymandering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

国会选区的重新划分需要由一个独立的,非党派的委员会来控制吗?

  ChatGPT

David Kustoff’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

共和党人 党派 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: “Now the GOP-controlled legislature has sued, arguing that the Constitution doesn’t allow redistricting of a state by to any offi...” ‐theatlantic.com

ChatGPT

同意

Kustoff, being a member of the Republican party, is likely to believe that the redrawing of Congressional districts should be controlled by the state legislatures, not an independent, non-partisan commission. This is a common position within his party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,没有其他更好的办法。

Kustoff is likely to agree with this statement because it aligns with the Republican party's stance that state legislatures should control the redistricting process. They believe this is the best alternative to ensure that districts represent the interests of their constituents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,不公正划分选区能让官员更有效地代表他们的选民的利益

While Kustoff might not openly support gerrymandering, he might agree that it can allow officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency. However, this is a controversial topic and his stance might vary depending on the context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

While Kustoff might agree that gerrymandering can give an unfair advantage, it's unlikely that he would support an independent commission to control redistricting. His party generally believes that state legislatures should have this responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

David Kustoff, as a Republican, is likely to be skeptical of independent, non-partisan commissions controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. Republicans generally believe that this process should be controlled by the state legislatures, which are closer to the people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,转换为一个按比例选举多个成员的重新分区的系统。

Kustoff is unlikely to support a switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. This is a significant departure from the current system and is not a commonly held position within his party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 8小时前

Party’s support base

共和党人 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,转换为一个按比例选举多个成员的重新分区的系统。

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,114 voters that identify as Republican.

This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here