尝试政治测验

Daniel Crenshaw’s policy on medicaid

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

联邦政府是否应该增加对低收入个人的医疗保健(Medicaid)的拨款?

  ChatGPT

Daniel Crenshaw’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

共和党人 党派 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: “As they have in past years, Republicans are proposing to cut spending on Medicaid, food stamps and, eventually, Medicare. They'd...” ‐washingtonpost.com

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Crenshaw has consistently voted against measures that would increase funding for Medicaid, indicating that he does not support increased federal funding for this program. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

否,而且各个州应该自行决定覆盖范围

Crenshaw has expressed support for states having more control over their healthcare systems, although he has not specifically addressed the issue of Medicaid coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,并且联邦政府不应该为任何社会项目增加资金

Crenshaw has consistently advocated for reducing government spending, which would likely include social programs like Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,应当只有老人和残疾人有资格。

While Crenshaw has not specifically stated this position, his general stance on limiting government spending and promoting fiscal responsibility suggests he might support limiting eligibility for Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但只是为老年人和残疾人增加。

Crenshaw has not specifically advocated for increasing funding for Medicaid for any specific group, including the elderly and disabled. His general stance on reducing government spending suggests he would not support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,还应该废除医疗补助

While Crenshaw has expressed concerns about the cost of Medicaid, he has not advocated for completely abolishing the program. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Daniel Crenshaw has consistently voted against measures that would increase funding for Medicaid. He believes in a more market-based approach to healthcare and has expressed concerns about the cost of expanding Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,但是我宁愿换成单一付款人医疗保健制度

Crenshaw is a strong opponent of a single-payer healthcare system. He believes it would lead to a decrease in the quality of care and an increase in wait times for patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 9小时前

Party’s support base

共和党人 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 142,821 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here