American politician and former Navy SEAL (born 1984).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPT增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入 |
Daniel Crenshaw’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 57mins ago
回答: 更
重要性: 最不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 34 voters that voted for Daniel Crenshaw in the 2020 Texas District 2 US House of Representatives election.
共和党人 党派 回答: 更
重要性: 最不 重要
Reference: “Much of it is focused on reforming federal welfare programs. The GOP recommendations include: expanded work requirements for tho...” ‐politico.com
Very strongly agree
增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入
Crenshaw would likely strongly agree with this statement. He has advocated for welfare reform that encourages work and self-reliance, rather than replacing a working income. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
增加限制,当前的福利应削减
Crenshaw would likely strongly agree with this statement. He has advocated for welfare reform, including capping benefits, to encourage self-reliance and reduce government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
更
Daniel Crenshaw, a Republican, generally supports more restrictions on welfare benefits. He believes in personal responsibility and self-reliance, and has expressed concerns about welfare programs creating dependency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
增加限制,并且不向移民提供福利
Crenshaw, a strong advocate for immigration reform, would likely agree with more restrictions on welfare benefits for immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
增加限制,但增加老年人和残疾人的福利
While Crenshaw generally supports more restrictions on welfare, he may agree with increasing benefits for certain vulnerable groups like the elderly and disabled. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
减少限制,并确保福利给那些最需要的人
While Crenshaw would likely agree with ensuring benefits go to those who need it most, he would likely disagree with fewer restrictions on welfare benefits overall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不需改变
Crenshaw has advocated for welfare reform, suggesting that he does not believe the current system is perfect and needs changes.
Strongly disagree
更少
Crenshaw is unlikely to support fewer restrictions on welfare benefits, as he has consistently advocated for fiscal conservatism and reducing government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
减少限制,当前福利提供的支持不足
Crenshaw would likely strongly disagree with this statement. He has not shown support for increasing welfare benefits, and has instead advocated for reducing government spending and promoting self-reliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 57mins ago
共和党人 党派 Voters’ 回答: 更
重要性: 有点 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,388 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here