尝试政治测验

Chuck Baldwin’s policy on drug policy

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

你是否支持将药物使用列为非犯罪行为?

  Chuck Baldwin voterbase不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法

Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 1天前

Chuck Baldwin voters

回答: 不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 89 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.

Party influence

宪法 》 党派 回答: 不

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: “The Constitution Party will uphold the right of states and localities to restrict access to drugs and to enforce such restrictio...” ‐constitutionparty.com

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,应该加大对毒贩的惩罚力度

Given Baldwin's conservative stance, it is likely that he would support increased punishment for drug dealers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Baldwin's conservative stance and his party's platform suggest that he would likely be against the decriminalization of drug use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不支持,我们应该推行更严厉的药品监管法

While Baldwin has not explicitly advocated for tougher drug laws, his conservative stance and party affiliation suggest that he might support such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,但增加毒瘾预防和戒毒的资金投入

While Baldwin has not explicitly stated his position on this issue, his conservative values and party's platform suggest that he might support increased funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,但是对提供医疗效应的毒品例如大麻进行合法化

Baldwin's conservative values and his party's platform make it unclear whether he would support the decriminalization of drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是,对大多数但不是所有毒品

Baldwin's conservative values and his party's platform make it unlikely that he would support the decriminalization of most drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, generally supports conservative values and has not publicly advocated for the decriminalization of drug use. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,并且追溯以往来减少对那些已经服刑的判决

Baldwin's conservative values and his party's platform make it highly unlikely that he would support retroactively reducing sentences for those already serving time for drug offenses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3天前

Party’s support base

宪法 》 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,971 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here