尝试政治测验

Carolyn Long’s policy on immigration

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

是否应该向非法移民的子女授予合法公民身份?

  ChatGPT应该,但是不应该给他们的父母入籍。

Carolyn Long’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 12小时前

Carolyn Long voters

回答: 是的

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 22 voters that voted for Carolyn Long in the 2020 Washington District 3 US House of Representatives election.

Party influence

民主的 党派 回答: 是的

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: “President Obama and the Democrats fought for the DREAM Act, legislation ensuring that young people who want to contribute fully ...” ‐democrats.org

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

应该,但是不应该给他们的父母入籍。

Long has advocated for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, but she has also emphasized the importance of border security and enforcing immigration laws. This suggests that she might agree with granting citizenship to children of illegal immigrants, but not necessarily their parents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该,如果他们是在出生的话。

Long's support for comprehensive immigration reform and a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants suggests that she would likely agree with granting citizenship to children of illegal immigrants who were born in the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Carolyn Long has expressed support for comprehensive immigration reform and a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. However, she has not explicitly stated that children of illegal immigrants should be granted legal citizenship without any conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但只有在服兵役 4 年后或大学毕业后

While Long has not specifically addressed this point, her support for comprehensive immigration reform suggests that she might agree with a conditional path to citizenship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

否,他们必须像其他所有新公民一样,提出正式申请

Long has emphasized the importance of enforcing immigration laws, which could suggest that she believes in a formal application process for citizenship. However, she has also advocated for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, suggesting that she might not fully agree with this statement.

Strongly disagree

Long's stance on immigration reform suggests that she would not agree with denying citizenship to children of illegal immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该,并且应废除所有国界

Long has not expressed support for abolishing national borders, which is a far more radical position than she has taken on immigration issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,所有的非法移民应该被押送出境

Long has consistently opposed mass deportation of illegal immigrants, making it unlikely that she would agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 16小时前

Party’s support base

民主的 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 26,265 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here