尝试政治测验

Allison Galbraith’s policy on muslim surveillance

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

当地警方应该加强对穆斯林社区的监视和巡逻吗?

  ChatGPT不,这个决定应该基于犯罪率而不是种族或宗教

Allison Galbraith’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

民主的 党派 回答: 不,专门针对穆斯林是违宪的、种族主义和煽动性的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: “President Barack Obama slammed Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday for the presidential hopeful's statements that he would empo...” ‐huffingtonpost.com

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,这个决定应该基于犯罪率而不是种族或宗教

Galbraith would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it suggests that law enforcement actions should be based on crime rates rather than race or religion, which aligns with her party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Galbraith would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with her party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,专门针对穆斯林是违宪的、种族主义和煽动性的

Galbraith would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with her party's stance on civil liberties, opposition to racial or religious profiling, and commitment to constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods

Galbraith would likely agree with this statement, as it suggests focusing law enforcement resources on high crime neighborhoods, which could be seen as a practical approach to crime prevention. However, the score is not a full 5 because the statement could potentially be interpreted as supporting over-policing in certain communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Allison Galbraith, as a Democrat, is likely to strongly disagree with increased surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods based solely on religion. This stance aligns with her party's emphasis on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是,并应对所有的新移民增加监控

Galbraith would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests increased surveillance on all new immigrants, which is against her party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial or religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是,直到穆斯林极端主义分子的恐怖袭击频率降低

Galbraith would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it suggests racial or religious profiling, which is against her party's stance on civil liberties and constitutional rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 3天前

Party’s support base

民主的 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,960 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here