尝试政治测验

Abigail Spanberger’s policy on gerrymandering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

国会选区的重新划分需要由一个独立的,非党派的委员会来控制吗?

  ChatGPT是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

Abigail Spanberger’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

民主的 党派 回答: 是的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: “"Gerrymandering distorts our democracy. Democrats will enact measures to end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections. Effor...” ‐democrats.org

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,在重新划分选区的时候强势政权为执政党提供了不公平的条件

Spanberger, as a Democrat, would likely strongly agree with the statement that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. This is a common position among Democrats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

Abigail Spanberger, as a Democrat, would likely support the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts to prevent gerrymandering. However, there is no specific record of her stating this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,转换为一个按比例选举多个成员的重新分区的系统。

While there is no specific record of Spanberger supporting a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, as a Democrat, she would likely be open to alternatives to the current system that could reduce gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given her party's general stance against gerrymandering, it is unlikely that Spanberger would support the idea of not having an independent, non-partisan commission control the redrawing of Congressional districts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,没有其他更好的办法。

Spanberger would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies that there is no better alternative to the current system, which can allow for gerrymandering. As a Democrat, she would likely believe that there are better alternatives, such as an independent, non-partisan commission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,不公正划分选区能让官员更有效地代表他们的选民的利益

Spanberger would likely strongly disagree with this statement, as it supports gerrymandering, which is generally opposed by Democrats. Gerrymandering is often seen as a way for officials to manipulate district lines to their advantage, rather than to more effectively represent their constituents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 22hrs ago

Party’s support base

民主的 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,787 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here