You've addressed none of my information about Zelensky's tyranny, about how he banned eleven opposition parties and an entire religious denomination, to which I may add that lots of the places Russia is attacking in fact wish to be a part of Russia. But let's set these major logical problems for you aside for just one moment and consider the absurd argument you've presented. You've made a syllogism argument, with a missing premise, to avoid directly using a fallacy. Your argument is
(1) Nations which have larger economies than others have a duty to intervene in the wars of nations with smaller economies. (This is the major premise, which you left unstated.)
(2) We have a large economy (in fact the largest on earth)
(3) Ukraine has a smaller economy
(4) Therefore we should intervene in the Ukraine War.
First of all, one of the reasons our economy is so enormous is because our country just so happens to be one of largest, in terms of population, on the face of the planet, therefore necessitating a larger economy to provide a good standard of living for its inhabitants. But let's ignore this glaring problem for a moment (This is the second logical problem I've had to ignore so far in this single comment) and examine your argument.
By claiming we have some moral duty to provide endless funding to prolong Zelensky's War, you're reverting back to the imperialist logic of centuries ago that the strong have a duty to protect the weak, no matter how evil the weak may be. Guess what happened to the empires of the centuries ago? That's right, they got so hampered with debt and expenses that they went bankrupt and collapsed. That's our fate if your plan is used – destruction. Feel free to comment back, but please address the claims I have actually made.
Hãy là người đầu tiên trả lời bình luận này.