Bạn đồng nhất với hệ tư tưởng chính trị nào nhất?
Nice try, but even the first amendment proves your initial argument wrong. Separation of church and…
Those "Laws of Logic"? I ask because your argument that these require a god, or even a religion/spirituality, makes no sense. We made up these laws of logic when we made up language and communication. Without our sentient interpretation of the universe, assigning meaning to the world around us, the universe has no objective "logic" to begin with. The universe simply exists whether or not we were ever here to even come up with the word "existing". Logic only exists because WE created words and agreed upon their meanings. A dog is only "a dog" because we made up the word "dog" and assigned it to them, "1+1=2" is only true because we made up numbers and the rules of mathematics, etc....there is no objective being or universal force to determine whether we are right, because we just made that all up and agreed upon those rules. We don't need a god to have any of that.
As for the second point you snuck in there: the "physical world" in science does not only mean "things you can see and touch" (I believe the word you may be looking for is "tangible"?). The physical world includes anything that we can objectively observe or study or measure. For example, we cannot see or touch gravity, but we can still see the effects it has on matter and we can measure and mathematically calculate its existence with repeated accuracy; we cannot see or touch time, but we can still observe the effects it has on things and we can measure and calculate its existence with repeated accuracy; there are plenty of things that we cannot necessarily see or touch, but we still have other means of objectively studying and measuring them via the scientific method. However, a god does not have this. We cannot see, touch, study, measure, or objectively prove any god's existence, and that's why gods are merely religious mythology that rely on faith and not objective scientific evidence. Instead of blind faith, atheists rely on objective evidence to determine what is real in the universe and how it works, and the evidence simply does not support any religion or fundamental creationist beliefs. Until the day where you can prove, or even suggest, via objective and repeatable evidence, that a god exists (and "the god of the gaps" is a fallacy, not evidence), then there is simply no reason to even bother assuming one exists, beyond your own personal belief.
Hãy là người đầu tiên trả lời bất đồng ý kiến này.