It's understandable that a women would want a chance to have a clean life especially if the child is the result of a rape, but terminating a fetus is a very morally gray area that despite one of the primary debates in favor of pro-choice being on religious grounds, there seems to be lots of generally accepted data that suggests that a fetus can indeed feel pain and is a living being. And while the fetus may not be entirely conscious throughout the entirety of the pregnancy wouldn't it be a much more morally safe option to simply give the child up for adoption. If someone isn't a doctor or has a degree in human biology then they themselves cannot prove that a fetus is a human being or not, and as a result people are really just trusting their intuition on whether or not someone is a credible source for this kind of information. it may be more reasonable to give the child up for adoption. While I understand that this is a very commonly iterated point, it fulfils two unique problems, one in that the mother of the unwanted child doesn't take responsibility for caring for the child, and another family that does want a child has the opportunity to care for the child.