Har du stödja användningen av hydraulisk fracking att utvinna olje- och naturgasresurser?

Om en vän hävdade att fracking är avgörande för ekonomisk tillväxt, hur skulle du svara, med tanke på både miljön och skapande av jobb?

Tror du att tekniska framsteg kan göra fracking säkrare och mer miljövänligt, eller bör vi fokusera på alternativa resurser?

Vad är en förändring du skulle vara villig att göra i din nuvarande livsstil om det innebar att minska de negativa effekterna av energiutvinning?

Om du fick välja mellan lägre energikostnader eller miljöskydd, vilket skulle du välja och vad är avgörande för ditt beslut?

Hur föreställer du dig den ideala energiframtiden, och vilken roll spelar icke-förnybar energi i den visionen?

Med tanke på den globala efterfrågan på energi, hur balanserar man behovet av olja och gas med de potentiella riskerna för miljön?

Vilka värderingar eller prioriteringar tycker du bör styra våra energiproduktionsval inför klimatförändringarna och varför?

Har du eller någon du känner upplevt någon direkt påverkan från fracking, och i så fall vilken påverkan var det?

Hur skulle du känna om en fracking-sajt skapades nära ditt samhälle, och vilka problem eller fördelar tänker du på?

Yes, but be smart about it- I.E. Take into consideration where you will be fracking and if it will affect peoples homes, water, health and overall well being and quality of living

I support hydraulic fracking in the U.S., ONLY, if it is AMERICAN OWNED interests doing it. I am against foreign corps. (the Chinese) performing this here.

In a safer form, not in its current poisonous form. We shouldn't be leaving buried chemicals in the ground that will eventually seep into water supplies. In fact, why are they using the poisonous chemicals that they use now anyways, when they have safer and more efficient extraction methods?

Yes, but there needs to be verifiable evidence that it does not harm the ground water sources before it can be used

Concerns are based on sound evidence. Companies need to be controlled in their pursuit of oil at the expense of h2o and peoples health.

Yes, with greatly increased oversight but while also pursing renewable sources of energy such as solar, hydro, and wind power.

Yes but it needs to be done responsibly. Also there should be ongoing monitoring of its effects on the earth and environment. Again, oil is a finite commodity so look for alternative sources of energy.

I believe it is important for both our economy and current country affairs to continue to extract resources to fuel production and economy. However, fracking may not be the best choice. If it is the best choice for certain circumstances and it is needed to keep a healthy economy I believe it should be used. I am all for protecting the environment but I also recognize the need for natural resources and believe God gave us this earth to utilize for our benefit and well being. We should not intentionally destroy nature though.

Increase overesight, and scientific monitoring of fracking to determine if the process endangers water supplies, decreases ground stability, or has other harmful environmental effects.

Some fracking is perfectly harmless, and helpful. It's not a black and white issue, there are degrees of harm done, including none at all.

Fracking should be studied more for it's long term effects. The oil industry has not proved it is environmentally sound. Lighting tap water on fire says something is amiss. Ground water is more important.