Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsBallot PropositionLegislationGun controlMassachusettsSecond AmendmentFirearm RegulationsStates: Massachusetts•••Started 8mos agoActive 3wks ago

Should Massachusetts uphold a new gun law regulating assault weapons and expanding ERPOs?

Proponents say it enhances safety. Opponents argue it infringes on rights.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.7k America voters.

65%
Yes
35%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.7k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.7k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @BDSDDZZ from Massachusetts  answered…3wks3W

No, Massachusetts already has too many regulations regarding firearms.

 @BDR5QVS from Massachusetts  answered…4wks4W

No comment

 @BDL9T45 from Massachusetts  answered…1mo1MO

No, this might lead to ban on assault weapons. We should increase background checks, mental health, testing and training instead.

 @BDGHKGC from Massachusetts  answered…1mo1MO

I'm kind of in the middle about this.

 @BD8ZQPW  from Massachusetts  answered…2mos2MO

No. 2A reads "Shall not be infringed."

 @B9TC46R from Massachusetts  answered…5mos5MO

Well, if the bad guys have these weapons then no because the good guys need them too, but I do think they should have some regulation around them.

 @B9T974Q  from Massachusetts  answered…5mos5MO

No, all weapons of all types should be legalized for lawful gun owners. Anything other than that is treasonous and unconstitutional.

 @B9PW3WZ from Massachusetts  answered…5mos5MO

Regulate automatic weapons and background checks and manditory training, but do not take away the right to bear arms as a means of protection.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Israeli Bombings Kill 2,300 In Lebanon in 3 weeks

Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.The Israeli military has ordered people living in more than a quarter of Lebanon to flee, according to a UN calculation, as its fight with the Iran-backed Shia militant group Hizbollah threatens to engulf the Mediterranean country.Lebanese authorities say Israeli bombing has killed more than 2,300 people and injured almost 11,000, mostly in the past three weeks, with Israeli attacks reaching areas far beyond Hizbollah’s traditional bastions of support in the south.More than 1mn people have fled their homes in Lebanon in under a month, according to its government, a dramatic forced movement of the population in a country of only about 5mn inhabitants with a land mass smaller than the US state of Connecticut. Israeli forces began a ground offensive in south Lebanon two weeks ago, in their fourth invasion of the country in under five decades. They had already destroyed large parts of the densely populated southern Beirut suburb where Hizbollah had its headquarters, and killed many top militant commanders in air strikes, including former leader Hassan Nasrallah.Rema Jamous Imseis, Middle East director of UNHCR, told journalists in Geneva that “over 25 per cent of [Lebanon is] under a direct Israeli military evacuation order”. “People are heeding these calls to evacuate and they’re fleeing with almost nothing,” she added, saying that 80 per cent of the shelters opened by the Lebanese government — mostly in schools — were now full.

▲  1012 replies

About This Data

Based on 2.7k responses to this question.

These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

iSideWith. (2026). “Should Massachusetts uphold a new gun law regulating assault weapons and expanding ERPOs?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 19, 2026, from https://www.isidewith.com/poll/5495575083

Embed The Live Result

Preview