+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 471 Fulton voters.

33%
Yes
67%
No
33%
Yes
67%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 471 Fulton voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 471 Fulton voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Fulton voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @n35w101  from Oklahoma  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, real estate is already taxed annually based on their current valuation, even when not sold. I see no reason why other assets shouldn't be treated similarly.

 @9TSRQSW from Arizona  answered…8mos8MO

25% is way to much to tax anybody, just because they are making more money than others doesn't mean that they should get a quarter of their annual income taken from them

 @9TRLW9J from Florida  answered…8mos8MO

The value of an asset is based on what someone is willing to pay for it. If the item has not sold then there is only speculation on the value. It’s not fair to tax anyone on someone else’s speculation of value.

 @9TSHCBZ from North Carolina  answered…8mos8MO

Only if two criteria are met: 1. it would only apply to individuals with net unrealized gains in a given year of $100 million + 2. they would be able to take unrealized losses against the unrealized gains.

 @9TSHJQ2 from West Virginia  answered…8mos8MO

No, unrealized gains can drop due to the nature of them not being sold. Only realized gains should be taxed because they are locked in. Unrealized gains can become a loss quickly.

 @9TTFYGH from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

I can swallow my pride and acknowledge that I'm not educated enough to give a nuanced answer on this topic. If you're asking "should we tax Bezos' 38 trillion Amazon shares he hasn't sold yet" then sure, why not

 @9TTXNZC from Texas  answered…8mos8MO

If it means the super wealthy don't have to pay as much taxes as the poor then yes they should be taxed.

 @B4BQNLZ from Maryland  answered…2mos2MO

No, instead increase the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations