This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Zipcode
Response rates from 25.7k America voters.
Trend of support over time for each answer from 25.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 25.7k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MKD8QM2yrs2Y
ASBOLUTELY NOT, and AI is not a person NOR a PEER which would be making a mockery of our legal system which is already plagued by several other issues.
@9SNR8JG2yrs2Y
Yes, it should be used to assist in making decisions. AI can analyze a record to determine what the expected punishments are from an unbiased view but it is up to judges and jury to make a final decision based on extenuating circumstances of the individual.
@9TFW8PN2yrs2Y
AI needs more research, but could be used as a factual guide to assist humans in making a non biased judgement.
@9L4Z23B 2yrs2Y
No, not yet. More studies need to be conducted first
@B5X32CW10mos10MO
no judges should not have to rely on AI to make decisions that will drastically effect lives. They have to have a clear and thorough understanding of the law
@B24ZD621yr1Y
No, not directly. We can use it to assist in some information, but the decision should not be made BY AI, it should still be made by a person.
@9ZMRJJR1yr1Y
No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI yet as it provides fake cases to create an opinion for a singular side.
@9ZZ2C231yr1Y
no way, we’re talking about computers they have no feelings about what prison life does to a person especially solitary confinement. It should be outlawed
Join in on the most popular conversations.
