Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsHousing IssuesStarted 2yrs agoActive 18hrs ago

Should the government provide subsidies for first-time homebuyers?

These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Grand Rapids (Michigan)

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 247 Grand Rapids voters.

67%
Yes
33%
No
67%
Yes
33%
No
0%
Yes, but only for low income homebuyers
0%
No, incentivize construction of affordable homes instead
0%
No, focus on affordability issues like interest rates and housing supply instead
0%
No, this would lead to another housing bubble

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 247 Grand Rapids voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 247 Grand Rapids voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Grand Rapids voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZJSZ8Z from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should focus on lowering interest rates and inflation, which would lower the cost of home buying for first time buyers.

 @9RZY5CM from Louisiana  answered…2yrs2Y

I'd rather the government make landlords illegal and take over all their properties. And charge a much lower amount to rent to non-homeowners.

 @9RSDVGN from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but they should incentivize construction of more housing and residential buildings to reduce prices.

 @7WDP6PT  from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, this would help ease the burden of bills of the first time home buyer and make people want to get a house as well

 @B5LDN7M from Indiana  answered…1yr1Y

Subsidies will force people into the same area for their whole life. Instead, focus should be put on reducing the overall cost of houses through decreasing inflation.

 @B5X32CW from California  answered…11mos11MO

if someone has served in the military then they can use their GI bill to put 0% down on a home. Other than that no

 @9RFDC4V from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on income and the type of house being developed. If it is for purely ownership of the house to be used by the owner and used as the primary residence by the family then yes it should be subsidized.

 @BDSX8CP from Massachusetts  answered…5 days5D

Within a transition period of adding more affordability measures yes, but phased out as interest rates and housing supply is fixed.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Jack Smith files to drop Jan. 6 charges against Donald Trump

Special counsel Jack Smith has filed a motion to drop all four felony charges against President-elect Donald Trump in connection with his effort to overturn his 2020 presidential election in the lead-up to the deadly Jan. 6 attack on the U.S Capitol.Trump was first indicted on four felonies in August 2023: conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding and conspiracy against rights. The case was then put on hold for months as Trump’s team argued that Trump could not be prosecuted.The indictment marked an extraordinary moment in American history — the first-ever accusation that a president sought illegally to cling to power.The dismissal also marks a historic moment. Fifty years after Richard Nixon was forced by lawmakers from both parties to resign the presidency amid allegations of criminal conduct, half of American voters will return Trump to the presidency despite his own serious charges of criminal misconduct in office.“The Government’s position on the merits of the defendant’s prosecution has not changed. But the circumstances have," Smith’s office wrote in Monday’s filing, adding that it is seeking to dismiss the charges ahead of Trump's inauguration, in line with the Justice Department’s longstanding position that it can’t charge a sitting president.“That prohibition is categorical and does not turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government’s proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Government stands fully behind," the special counsel added.The Supreme Court handed Trump an early victory in the case in July with its ruling on presidential immunity. But a new federal grand jury indicted Trump on the same four charges again in August, alleging that Trump’s false claims about mass voter fraud during the 2020 election were “unsupported, objectively unreasonable, and ever-changing” and that Trump “knew that they were false.”

▲  106 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies