Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsHousing Issues2yrs ago

Should the government provide subsidies for first-time homebuyers?

These subsidies are financial aids from the government to help individuals purchase their first home, making homeownership more accessible. Proponents argue that it helps people afford their first home and promotes homeownership. Opponents argue that it distorts the housing market and could lead to higher prices.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  State Senate District 34 (California)

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 599 State Senate District 34 voters.

77%
Yes
23%
No
77%
Yes
22%
No
1%
Yes, but only for low income homebuyers
1%
No, focus on affordability issues like interest rates and housing supply instead
0%
No, incentivize construction of affordable homes instead
0%
No, this would lead to another housing bubble

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 599 State Senate District 34 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 599 State Senate District 34 voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from State Senate District 34 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZJSZ8Z from Indiana  answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government should focus on lowering interest rates and inflation, which would lower the cost of home buying for first time buyers.

 @9RZY5CM from Louisiana  answered…2yrs2Y

I'd rather the government make landlords illegal and take over all their properties. And charge a much lower amount to rent to non-homeowners.

 @9RSDVGN from Virginia  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but they should incentivize construction of more housing and residential buildings to reduce prices.

 @7WDP6PT  from North Carolina  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, this would help ease the burden of bills of the first time home buyer and make people want to get a house as well

 @B5LDN7M from Indiana  answered…1yr1Y

Subsidies will force people into the same area for their whole life. Instead, focus should be put on reducing the overall cost of houses through decreasing inflation.

 @B5X32CW from California  answered…12mos12MO

if someone has served in the military then they can use their GI bill to put 0% down on a home. Other than that no

 @9RFDC4V from Kansas  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on income and the type of house being developed. If it is for purely ownership of the house to be used by the owner and used as the primary residence by the family then yes it should be subsidized.

 @BDVNL5D from California  answered…1wk1W

Yes and it should be for all first time homebuyers regardless of whether the previous living generation has owned property. It is wrong to assume that because someone has a parent who owns a home that they can afford to and are willing to provide financial assistance for their children to purchase a home of their own.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

U.S. Students Slide in Math, Science Test Scores

U.S. scores were no better than when the tests were first given in 1995. In math, the recent declines wiped out years of gains. American science scores have fallen since 2015, although the latest drops from 2019 weren’t statistically significant.The results come as President-elect Donald Trump has criticized America’s education system and pledged to abolish the federal Education Department. Wednesday’s release did come with a slice of good news, though: U.S. students still score above international averages, which include countries with a range of economic levels.Some other countries’ scores also declined since before the pandemic, but U.S. rankings slid comparatively on some measures, falling to 24 out of 45 education systems in eighth-grade math and 15 out of 63 in fourth-grade science.Countries whose performance moved ahead of the U.S. included Finland in math, England in science, and Poland for both subjects in fourth grade.High-scoring countries included Singapore, Japan and England. Officials say it is difficult to determine why some places excel and others struggle. The quality of a country’s schools, as well as other factors like poverty, can influence test performance. Carr said some countries use curriculum that is more closely aligned with the TIMSS exams.Even as U.S. schools have long since returned to normal from Covid-19 closures, educators struggled with new challenges. More teachers have left the profession. Student misbehavior and absenteeism jumped. “Coming out of Covid, parents and students got comfortable with the idea that it’s OK to stay home,” said Suzan Harris, a middle-school principal in Butts County, Ga. Chronic absenteeism rates have improved recently, but remain elevated compared with prepandemic figures, according to an American Enterprise Institute compilation of state data.In the years before the pandemic, national exams showed that school achievement was already stagnating or declining.

▲  95 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1yr1Y

Biden bans new offshore oil drilling along most of US coastline

President Joe Biden announced a ban on new offshore oil and gas drilling along most of the US coastline on Monday in a move designed to bolster his environmental and climate legacy as he prepares to leave office.The order will protect 625mn acres of ocean on the US east coast, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, the Pacific coasts of Washington, Oregon and California, as well as portions of the Northern Bering Sea in Alaska, the White House said on Monday.“My decision reflects what the coastal communities, business and beachgoers have known for a long time: that drilling off these coasts could cause irreversible damage to places we hold dear and is unnecessary to meet our nation’s energy needs,” Biden said.The executive action will not prevent oil and gas companies obtaining leases in the central and western parts of the Gulf of Mexico, areas that produce almost 15 per cent of the nation’s oil supplies. Nevertheless, the move is expected to complicate the policy agenda of incoming president Donald Trump, who has vowed to “drill, baby, drill” and boost US oil production, even though it is already at a record level.The Trump transition team said it was a disgraceful decision designed to exact “political revenge on the American people” and the incoming president said he would immediately “unban” Biden’s prohibition on new offshore drilling.“I have the right to unban it immediately . . . we can’t let that happen to our country. It’s our greatest, it’s really our greatest economic asset,” Trump told conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt in an interview on Monday.Biden’s action will probably be challenged by the oil industry in court and face pushback from Republicans in Congress. But overturning the order could prove challenging and may require an act of Congress, according to legal experts.Biden is using his authority under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, to protect the areas from drilling — the same mechanism which former president Barack Obama used previously to ban offshore drilling in some Arctic and Atlantic waters in 2016.In 2019, a federal judge ruled that an executive order by former president Donald Trump that lifted an Obama-era ban on oil and gas drilling in the Arctic Ocean was unlawful.

▲  1910 replies