This policy would limit the amount a CEO can earn compared to the average salary of their employees. Proponents argue that it would reduce income inequality and ensure fairer compensation practices. Opponents argue that it would interfere with business autonomy and could discourage top executive talent.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Congressional District
Response rates from 17.5k America voters.
52% Yes |
48% No |
52% Yes |
48% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 17.5k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 17.5k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@Levi-Blevins 1yr1Y
No, but they should enforce a higher minimum employee wage based on CEO salary.
@B2C5DJH5mos5MO
No, but raise the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for CEO's' large corporations
@3GBWB4V 1yr1Y
Yes for Corporations and Government Organizations, no for Non-Profit Organizations. Also is dependent on how high/low the cap is itself.
@ArghhGeeDub 5mos5MO
Yes, around 15-20 times their lowest-paid employee (and lowest-paid employee of any company contracted to perform a service at their establishments on a regular basis).
@B5JPL6F1mo1MO
There should be a workers representation board on corporations that can set a cap on their CEOs to ensure fair distribution of corporate earnings. We should also be vigilant against tax evasion.
@B5GR9V51mo1MO
Yes, CEO's should receive pay and compensation on par with the companies currently lowest paid employee.
@B5BSQWY1mo1MO
Yes, to an extent. CEOs should not be making too much money when their employees are struggling with the pay that they get
@B58NX8H2mos2MO
Not a political issue I think businesses should pay an equal amount to all employees including the top executives
Join in on the most popular conversations.