@ISIDEWITHQuestionseconomyStarted 3yrs agoActive 2 days ago

Should America transition to a four-day workweek?

Should the United States transition to a four-day workweek?

Countries including Ireland, Scotland, Japan, and Sweden are experimenting with a four-day workweek, which requires employers to provide overtime pay to employees working more than 32 hours per week.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 25.3k America voters.

59%
Yes
41%
No
54%
Yes
41%
No
5%
Yes, and require overtime pay for work over four days per week

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 25.3k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 25.3k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9HKRSQP  from Massachusetts  answered…12mos12MO

No, students and adults need to stop being so lazy and work. 5 days is the sufficient amount of work time.

 @9CHNXGW from Illinois  answered…1yr1Y

Up to the company

 @ISIDEWITHanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, and transition to a four-day, 32-hour work week with no reduction in wages or benefits

 @8YFJMFB from Texas  answered…3yrs3Y

It should be up to the company.

 @97QZSNY from Illinois  answered…2yrs2Y

Companies should decide for themselves

 @9F8QS8H from Washington  answered…1yr1Y

No, sufficient work could not be completed in just 4 days

 @8XXXPMM from Ohio  answered…3yrs3Y

Up to the employer.

 @9ZKPQXZ from Kansas  answered…1mo1MO

We should first look at how the experiments play out before transitioning to something potentially drastic.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Four-day Workweek” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…9mos9MO

Bernie Sanders Champions a Four-Day Workweek Bill in the U.S.

In a bold move that could redefine the American work culture, Senator Bernie Sanders has introduced a groundbreaking bill aimed at establishing a four-day workweek across the United States, without any reduction in workers' pay. This legislative proposal, which seeks to shorten the standard workweek from 40 to 32 hours, has sparked a nationwide conversation about work-life balance, productivity, and the future of labor in the country. Sanders, an Independent senator from Vermont who caucuses with the Democrats, has long been an advocate for workers' rights and progressive labor reforms. His latest initiative is no exception, as it challenges the traditional five-day work model that has dominated the U.S. labor market for decades.The proposed bill, unveiled on a Wednesday, is not just about reducing work hours; it's a comprehensive approach to improving the quality of life for American workers. By maintaining full pay and benefits for a shorter workweek, the legislation aims to address issues of burnout, stress, and the elusive work-life balance that many Americans struggle to achieve. Sanders argues that moving to a 32-hour workweek is 'not a radical idea,' citing examples from other countries where similar models have led to increased productivity and happier, healthier workers.The implications of such a bill are far-reaching. For employers, it presents a challenge to traditional business operations but also offers an opportunity to innovate in terms of workforce management and productivity strategies. For employees, it promises more time for personal pursuits, family, and rest, potentially leading to a more satisfied and engaged workforce. The economic and social benefits of a four-day workweek have been debated among economists, with some suggesting it could lead to greater consumer spending and a boost in overall well-being.As the bill heads to a hearing, its prospects in Congress remain uncertain. However, the conversation it has ignited reflects a growing recognition of the need for labor reforms that prioritize the well-being of workers. Whether or not Sanders' four-day workweek becomes a reality, it marks a significant moment in the ongoing dialogue about the future of work in America.In a time when the nature of work is rapidly evolving, Sanders' proposal offers a vision of a more balanced, humane approach to labor. As the debate unfolds, it will be interesting to see how policymakers, businesses, and the public respond to the idea of reimagining the American workweek for the 21st century.

▲  2

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3wks3W

Donald Trump nominates Pam Bondi as the next Attorney General

Former President and 2024 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi as the next Attorney General of the United States, should he reclaim the presidency in the upcoming election.Bondi, a prominent figure in Republican politics, served as Florida's Attorney General from 2011 to 2019. She gained national attention for her legal battles on issues such as health care reform, consumer protection, and opioid abuse litigation. Known for her steadfast support of Trump during his presidency, Bondi also served as a key adviser during his first impeachment trial, where she defended his administration against accusations of abuse of power.In a statement released by his campaign, Trump praised Bondi’s “unwavering commitment to justice” and her “track record of standing up for everyday Americans against the abuses of Washington’s elites.”“Pam Bondi has been a fearless advocate for the people, and she embodies the principles of fairness, accountability, and the rule of law that are sorely needed to restore trust in our justice system,” Trump said. “She is the right person to lead the Department of Justice into a new era of integrity and excellence.”While Bondi’s nomination has been met with applause from conservative circles, it has also reignited criticism from Democrats and ethics watchdogs. Her acceptance of a $25,000 donation from the Trump Foundation in 2013, which coincided with her decision not to pursue an investigation into Trump University, has drawn scrutiny in the past and resurfaced following the announcement.Democratic leaders have already voiced opposition, questioning Bondi’s ability to lead the Department of Justice independently. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) called the nomination “a political power play” and urged a focus on “restoring integrity, not entrenching partisanship.”

▲  2317 replies

Active 3 days ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3wks3W

Kamala Harris is considering running for president again in 2028

Kamala Harris has been lying low since her defeat in the presidential race, unwinding with family and senior aides in Hawaii before heading back to the nation’s capital.But privately, the vice president has been instructing advisers and allies to keep her options open — whether for a possible 2028 presidential run, or even to run for governor in her home state of California in two years. As Harris has repeated in phone calls, “I am staying in the fight.”She is expected to explore those and other possible paths forward with family members over the winter holiday season, according to five people in the Harris inner circle, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Her deliberations follow an extraordinary four months in which Harris went from President Joe Biden’s running mate to the top of the ticket, reenergizing Democrats before ultimately crashing on election night.“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”“She doesn’t have to decide if she wants to run for something again in the next six months,” said one former Harris campaign aide. “The natural thing to do would be to set up some type of entity that would give her the opportunity to travel and give speeches and preserve her political relationships.”Harris concedes: 'We must accept the results of this election'SharePlay VideoMost immediately, Harris and her advisers are working to define how and when she will speak out against Donald Trump and reassert her own role in the Democratic Party. Closing out her term as vice president, she’s set to preside over certifying the November election she lost to Trump, and then appear at the once-and-future president’s inauguration on Jan. 20.“There will be a desire to hear her voice, and there won’t be a vacuum for long,” a person close to Harris said.At the same time, Harris and her husband, Doug Emhoff, will have a long checklist to plow through before they leave the Naval Observatory for good.They have to decide whether they’ll take up permanent residence at their home in Los Angeles, or establish a base elsewhere. No matter where Harris and her family live, some around her have expressed concerns about safety, as her Secret Service protection expires six months after stepping away.

▲  1023 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

Elizabeth Warren Walks Back Murder Comments

Congressional Democrats broadly denounced the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson Friday morning, after Republicans started accusing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of excusing violence.“No one's condoning this,” said Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.). “Violence never is the right answer for anything. And it was a horrible murder, a tragic loss for his family.” Warren this week condemned the shooting, but added that people “can be pushed only so far.”"We'll say it over and over," Warren said on MSNBC’S “The ReidOut.” " Violence is never the answer. This guy [Luigi Mangione] gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO of UnitedHealth, but you can only push people so far, and then they start to take matters into their own hands."In a statement to POLITICO, Warren said, “Violence is never the answer. Period. I should have been much clearer that there is never a justification for murder.” Top Republicans denounced Warren's comments and the walked-back rhetoric, with House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) calling it “inappropriate and dangerous.”Some House Democrats asked about the incident on Thursday pivoted the conversation to discuss policy options on health care or gun safety.“I don't really know that this is really a space that Congress normally weighs in on,” said Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas). “But at the end of the day, I think it’s an opportunity, because now people are talking about health care and to talk about the fact that this industry has honestly not been as helpful as it could be.”“Violence is never the answer,” said Rep. Troy Carter (D-La.). “We know that there are people suffering, there’s great challenges in healthcare. There's great challenges, and people have, in fact, been wronged, but a process of governance is the way to address that, not violence.”And Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) who denounced the murder, said the killer should be prosecuted and that “I do know that allegedly a ghost gun was used, and we should also ban ghost guns. There's no reason for them beyond the streets.”

▲  1614 replies