More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($25K-$50K) voters
Last answered 35 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($25K-$50K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 9, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by rt.com
5 years ago by net.au
5 years ago by theguardian.com
5 years ago by nytimes.com
5 years ago by net.au
5 years ago by bbc.co.uk
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
I love the job creation and economic growth it's creating, but am very concerned about the long-term effects and lack of disclosure regarding the process. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Berea, OH
There is not enough clear information of pros/cons to make an informed decision. Fracking chemicals should absolutely be made known along with all potential side effects, and affected communities should have the opportunity to vote for themselves. We... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Pasadena, CA
Yes, but there needs to be verifiable evidence that it does not harm the ground water sources before it can be used. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Denver, CO
Concerns are based on sound evidence. Companies need to be controlled in their pursuit of oil at the expense of h2o and peoples health. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Venice, FL
Some fracking is perfectly harmless, and helpful. It's not a black and white issue, there are degrees of harm done, including none at all. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Wisconsin Dells, WI
No, we would pursue more sustainable energy sources AND it is destroying our environment. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Salt Lake City, UT
Provided public referendum (not permissive) be done on a site-by-site basis with information about aquifers affected, proximities to and the nature and amount and half-life of every potential
taint to subterrainean water reservoirs and streams. Full... 6 years ago from a Republican in East Syracuse, NY
Yes, but we need greater safeguards, oversight and strict enforcement, with significant penalties, of companies that damage the environment. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Boerne, TX
Yes, but watching the movie, Gas Land, makes me very bias about regulations. They need to make sure they have high regulations so people cannot light their tap water on fire due to natural gas in their wells. 6 years ago from a Republican in Laona, WI
If there is an earthquake has it been studied in that Fracking could be the cause??? I believe any company who has the potential to endager live such as the last hazardess waste poisoning of water should pay into a cleanup program (which should remain... 6 years ago from a Democrat in Lawrence, MA
Yes, but increase protection for private property in the vicinity and hold businesses liable for any long-term damage to surrounding properties. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Lehman, PA
Yes, but continue to monitor to insure that the practice is safe and the public is not being overtly affected. 6 years ago from a Republican in Tempe, AZ
I dont know what this means. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Altoona, IA
Unknown,the jury is still out Need more data on risks to water supply and earthquakes. 6 years ago from a Republican in Universal City, TX
Yes, in the instance you own all the property, not simply rights. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Grand Rapids, MI
I don't have enough knowledge of the method to give an opinion at the moment. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Beech Grove, IN
Yes natural resouces, no oil. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Tallahassee, FL
No, fracking has far too many negative effects on the environment; namely groundwater supplies. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Fosterville, TN
Yes, but depending upon the depth of the drilling. 6 years ago from a Green in Littleton, CO
Yes if detailed research data is collected and analyzed while using this form of oil extraction. This data should be used to refine and evolve the practice of fracking to make it safer and to understand it's long term effects. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Branson, MO
Yes, but the chemicals used in the fracking process need to be made public. Owning a proprietary blend of chemicals shouldn't be considered when it is being pumped into public land, and ultimately, water tables. 6 years ago from a Green in Rochester, NY
Yes, as long as we use hydraulic fracking in a way that is safe for the environment. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Gloucester City, PA