More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Race (Asian) voters
Last answered 17 hours ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Race (Asian) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 5, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Race data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
4 years ago by theguardian.com
4 years ago by csmonitor.com
4 years ago by theguardian.com
4 years ago by co.nz
4 years ago by theguardian.com
4 years ago by cbc.ca
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Learn more about Edward Snowden
Edward Snowden is a former National Security Agency contractor who turned over classified documents revealing a board global surveillance program previously unknown to anyone outside the intelligence community. After the documents were published in the Guardian Newspaper in June 2013 Snowden fled to Russia where he is currently living under asylum. See recent Edward Snowden news
More stances on this issue
This will never happen. If they stripped Bobby Fisher's citizenship just for playing a game of chess, there's no way they're giving Snowden his citizenship back, let alone ever give him immunity. He fears that he'll be assassinated if... 4 years ago from a Republican in Cambridge, MA
Yes, he should be protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act
and they should investigate the CIA and NSA directors instead. 4 years ago from a Democrat in Coronado, CA
Not yet. He is a hero. But he splattered information indiscriminately. There are consequences for that. I think he needs to stay gone while all of this settles down and the damage assessed. Banishment is a penalty of itself for now. 4 years ago from a Democrat in Houston, TX
What he did was wrong. There were better ways for him to go. I am worried about the information that he has given China and Russia. What he did was treason. He doesn't deserve to be allowed to live here unless he is in prison. He deserves to be... 4 years ago from a Republican in Rockville, MD
Because the public does not hear the whole truth, (liberal media), I believe he should stand trial. I also think the directors of the CIA and NSA should also stand trial.
I believe Obama and "Killary" should stand trial for their parts in the... 4 years ago from a Democrat in Suburb Maryland Fac, MD
I have not ruled out his willingness to alert the public to the eavesdropping going on. Remember his actions were an outgrowth of 9-11 and we had to take steps to eliminate and suppress further attacks on the USA. Maybe we definitely need to be more... 5 years ago from a Democrat in North Little Rock, AR
Drop all charges against Edward Snowden! U.S. imperialism hands off Edward Snowden! Hands off Julian Assange! Drop all charges against and free private first class Chelsea (formerly Bradley) Manning! Prosecute and jail NSA and CIA and other agencies... 5 years ago from a Green in Saint Petersburg, FL
No he should be shot or executed for betraying his country and face the same fate of other whistle blowers. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Minneapolis, MN
He should be granted immunity only to stop him from leaking any more sensitive information. If there is a way to punish him, I'm in favor of it. 5 years ago from a Republican in Waldwick, NJ
Yes he should be protected under the "Whistleblower Protection Act, also investigate the CIA and NSA directors instead with a independent 3rd Party. 5 years ago from a Libertarian in Poway, CA
These should be separate questions. Ed Snowden is probably guilty, he should stand trial. Just because a lot of good came out of his actions, doesn't mean they weren't illegal. Separately from that, the NSA and CIA need to be investigated. 5 years ago from a Green in New Almaden, CA
I do not have a solid basis to provide an answer for that. 5 years ago from a Democrat in La Jolla, CA
The CIA, NSA and Snowden should be investigated. Snowden should get immunity if his information is accurate and if it can be proven that he did not release this information as an act of evil. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Lincolnwood, IL
Have him serve six months and issue an apology and then let him out because our prisons are overpopulated and he's not a violent offender. 5 years ago from a Green in New York, NY
I am not informed. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Tualatin, OR
Yes on conditions he shows how he did it so it won't happen in the future and any book, movie or tv rights he pays a percentage to the gov. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Redmond, WA
Immunity? No. She signed on for the general premise. Crucified? No. In jail for life? No. DO I think what she did was fundamentally wrong? No. 5 years ago from a Green in Princeton, NJ
No. He successfully started the conversation about domestic surveillance, but he also revealed constitutional/lawful activity to protect national security. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Chicago, IL
Some measure of whistleblower protection seems applicable.
To what degree did the CIA, NSA and Snowden commit criminal behavior ?. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Alexandria, VA
See how many of his revelations are true before judgment. 5 years ago from a Republican in Maricopa, AZ
I do not believe the government should have any kind of secret surveillance over the people. We as the people of our country have a right to know everything our government is doing. I don't think someone should be prosecuted for sharing the truth. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Redmond, WA
No, but scope of crimes charged should be more realistic to the "whistle blower" laws. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Quincy, MA