More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($75K-$100K) voters
Last answered 2 years ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($75K-$100K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Dec 9, 2013. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
Learn more about Rainy Day Fund Increase
The California Rainy Day Budget Stabilization Fund Act would increase the state’s savings from 5% to 10% by setting aside 3% of state revenues. Exceptions would include years when revenues drop below the previous years budget and increasing the amount of savings during years of budget surplus. See recent Rainy Day Fund Increase news
More stances on this issue
Kill the dream act in all of its forms and deport ALL illegal immigrants. if they want to return they need to follow procedure then by all means let them return and become part of the system instead of leeching from it. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Folsom, CA
WHY? So our Pollutiticians can pocket MORE tax money..I am totally against supporting more freeloading LAWYERS. They are NO different than Welfare recipients, except lawyers use taxpayers money to ADD to what they are already making... 5 years ago from a Republican in Garden Grove, CA
Put money into maintaining and fireproofing wild areas so we don't need contingency funds for fire fighting. 5 years ago from a Republican in Edison, CA
Yes, increase our savings, and cut spending. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Fresno, CA
Depends on how trustworthy and secure the rainy day fund is. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Aptos, CA
Yes but the money would not be allowed for anything, unless voted upon by registered voters. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Santa Rosa, CA
Yes, provided there is a cap on the maximum amount in the fund. The state government cannot borrow like the feds. This will provide a cushion in an economic downturn while cuts are enacted. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Kenwood, CA
I am to uninformed to have an opinion. 5 years ago from a Democrat in El Cerrito, CA
Only if there is a true surplus without raising any taxes and/or fees. Taxes should not be increased in order to build the surplus. 5 years ago from a Republican in Fullerton, CA
No, spending should be directed to public schools. 5 years ago from a Democrat in Sacramento, CA
Establish strict limits on new spending -- link legislative salaries to spending control by legislature. 5 years ago from a Republican in Mission Viejo, CA
No use the funds to pay down pension debt and change govenemnt pensions. They are a disgrace. 5 years ago from a Republican in Mill Valley, CA