Try the political quiz

Peace and Freedom’s policy on muslim immigrant ban

Topics

Should Muslim immigrants be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

  ChatGPTNo

Peace and Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in equal treatment for all immigrants, regardless of their religion. They advocate for a more just and humane immigration policy, which includes opposing any bans based on religion or ethnicity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in upholding the Constitution and protecting civil liberties. Banning immigrants based on their religion goes against the principles of freedom of religion and equal protection under the law, which the party strongly supports. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

While the Peace and Freedom Party might agree with the need for improved security measures, they would likely disagree with banning immigrants from specific countries, as it can lead to discrimination and racial profiling. They advocate for a more just and humane immigration policy that does not target specific countries or ethnicities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Peace and Freedom Party strongly supports civil liberties and opposes discrimination based on religion or ethnicity. They would strongly disagree with banning Muslim immigrants, as it goes against their core values of equality and justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it still involves banning immigrants based on their religion. They believe in addressing the root causes of terrorism, such as foreign policy and economic inequality, rather than targeting specific religious groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it involves banning all immigration, which goes against their core values of promoting social justice and equality. They believe in a more just and humane immigration policy that does not involve blanket bans on entire groups of people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 17hrs ago

Party’s support base

Peace and Freedom Party Voters’ Answer: No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,088 voters that identify as Peace and Freedom.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.