@6DNQLWYIndependence12mos
Fact is, all terrorist attacks thus far have been from Muslims - not Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Taoists, Seventh Day Adventists, atheists, Satanists, etc. So, let's call a spade a spade and understand that radical jihadist Islamist Muslims have targeted everything and everyone not in accordance with it's stance on well, everything. Is it okay to be leery of such folk? I say, YES.
From what I understand, every incoming immigrant who comes legally goes through 40 hours of interrogation and 3 background checks. How much more do we need?
Keep the country safe but make sure not to be racist.
Look closer to home for the terrorists SMH
Most of the "terrorism" is engineered by the CIA, Mossad, MI6 etc. The Muslims are fall guys.
@657CXJSRepublican12mos
We put Japanese and Germans in camps while at war. Are we not at war on terrorists?
@6B8H8KQRepublican12mos
no let only the real Muslims not the fake "Muslims" who are terrorists.
@9XKGHNBTranshumanist5 days
No only if there non religious or a deists same as any religion
Yes, but then we would have to screen all immigrants like that.
Yes, no Muslim immigration period.
No. Banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional, but we should improve the screening of immigrants from "high risk" countries. We also need to streamline the process for Canadians and Mexicans, while helping Canada and Mexico to improve their immigration policy.
No, but screen out and have heavy surveillance and background checks for high risk countries.
We should ban Muslims from the Middle East and Africa from entering the country permanently.
Just because someone's Muslim doesn't mean they're a threat. But, if a person isn't fleeing persecution, we should still perform background checks and they should go through a reformed immigration system.
I think we should allow immigrants just perform background checks and just make sure there good people and all that
We need to screen more
no, banning immigrants based on religion is unconstitutional, but we should do extensive background checks to make sure there is no terrorist connections
No, but increase security for our borders and background checks for all immigrants who enter the United States regardless of their nation of origin and religion
No, we should just aim for the throat and reinstate Trump's "Muslim Ban."
No but limit it and ban the Quran and other exterimist agendas
Yes, and we should reform our immigration to a net zero system, meaning for every immigrant coming in, one emigrant goes out. We should also only allow first world immigration.
No, but han immigrants from high risk countries who might be into terrorism organizations
No, they should go through the same screening protocol as all other immigrants
Yes, and ban all Muslims
No, they should be allowed but must pass a deep background check
Yes, ban and deport Muslims.
No, if they complete the legal immigration process.
No, but only accept Muslim Families.
No, do it by country not by religion.
@9MKX9SDConstitution12mos
Considerable ideological screening for potential islamic extremists. Exclude fundamentalists, favour reformists.
Government should screen everybody who immigrated
Banning all immigrants for what they believe in is wrong, but I still think that a better screening process should be used for all immigrants not just Muslims.
No, however high profile or known dangerous people or people apart of dangerous people should not be aloud
There should be a more extensive screening process. That may delay when they may enter the country, but it's better than outright banning Muslim immigrants.
no, but there should be a high security involved someway or another, or until the process is improved
@9LYBQF5Progressive12mos
All immigrants should be evaluated before coming into the country especially from high-risk countries, but banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional.
They should be allowed in on the condition they don´t have a criminal record, they learn the language, assimilate western values and national customs, have working skills, and they´re deeply screened to ensure they don´t pose a threat to national security.
@9LMK8S8Republican12mos
I feel like we need to have a strict screening process for all immigrants.
@9LKBF8TConstitution12mos
Immigration reform includes better screening of immigrants.
@9LCVTS7Republican12mos
No, we should allow immigrants after extensive background checks
No, but the government should actively work towards better screening materials for all immigrants regardless of religion
@9L5LW3KRepublican12mos
Not straight forward
@9KZW2TLRepublican12mos
No, but we should temporarily ban all immigration.
Deleted12mos
No, it's unconstitutional and cruel.
Still have much to learn regarding this subject matter
no, banning immigrants based on religion is unconstitutional. We should however screen people we allow to immigrate more closely. Regardless of country of origin, race, creed, color, religion, or sex.
No ban based on religion, but all immigrants thoroughly vetted
No, but they should be under a "high watch" status if they have been proven to have any questionable ties to terrorists/terrorism.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
