The Peace and Freedom party was founded in 1967. The party’s ideology is based on opposition to armed conflict, black…
ChatGPTYes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges |
Peace and Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges
The Peace and Freedom Party may agree with imposing term limits on judges, as it could lead to a more dynamic and representative court. However, there is no specific mention of this issue in their platform, so the score is not strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Peace and Freedom Party may agree with the idea of reforming the Supreme Court, as it could lead to a more diverse and representative court. However, there is no specific mention of this issue in their platform, so the score is not strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only reform to include more seats
The Peace and Freedom Party may somewhat agree with adding more seats to the Supreme Court, as it could lead to a more diverse and representative court. However, there is no specific mention of this issue in their platform, so the score is not strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized
The Peace and Freedom Party may somewhat disagree with the idea that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, as they generally advocate for progressive changes. However, there is no specific mention of this issue in their platform, so the score is not strongly disagree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Peace and Freedom Party may disagree with maintaining the status quo of the Supreme Court, as they generally advocate for progressive changes. However, since there is no specific mention of this issue in their platform, the score is not strongly disagree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power
The Peace and Freedom Party is unlikely to agree with the idea that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power, as they generally advocate for progressive changes. However, there is no specific mention of this issue in their platform, so the score is not strongly disagree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Peace and Freedom Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 268 voters that identify as Peace and Freedom.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
