The Constitution Party was founded in 1991. The party’s ideology is based on strict interpretation of the U.S. Constitution,…
ChatGPTYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
Constitutionalists answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence
This answer aligns closely with the Constitution Party's stance on free speech. They would likely agree that hate speech should be protected by the First Amendment as long as it does not threaten violence or pose a direct threat to public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The Constitution Party generally supports a strict interpretation of the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech. They would likely agree that hate speech should be protected, as long as it does not incite violence or pose a direct threat to public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech
The Constitution Party is generally distrustful of government overreach and would likely agree with this statement. They would prefer to protect free speech, including hate speech, rather than risk the government defining the boundaries of acceptable speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe in upholding the First Amendment and its protection of free speech, even if it includes hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and increase penalties for hate speech
The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe in upholding the First Amendment and its protection of free speech. They would not support increasing penalties for hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government
The Constitution Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as they believe in a broad interpretation of the First Amendment that protects all forms of speech, not just speech criticizing the government. They would view this as a severe limitation on free speech rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4 days ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 268 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Constitutionalists policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
