Her er svarene dine sammenlignet med denne velgerens svar.
Sosialt › LGBT adopsjonsrettigheter
BS>BS Personlig svarOn a personal level I have friends that are the most amazing same-sex parents while simultanesously I have straight friends who would be awful adopted parents. Religious groups should not be forced to go against their religious beliefs and since there are many options open to individuals, this should limit this issue. Families should be required to show capabilities to care for families with a close consideration from using children as props to score political and social changes. The world needs many more adoptive parents. I dont think this issue has a right or wrong answer but I do find it interesting that this does not come up with protected groups as much. I have not heard CAIR weight in with an official opinion on this situation. |
Sosialt › Abort
BS>BS Personlig svarThis should be the only choice: Pro life. Yes to morning after pill and first 30 days. Consideration for Rape and incest to 90 days. Consideration for life of the mother possibly later. Encourage adoption and private funding. Criminalize abortion after the point a child can be viable outside of the womb. |
Sosialt › Homofilt ekteskap
BS>BS Personlig svarThe original social definition of marriage was a man and worman who lived together and procreated. Legally, married people are entitled to some rights. Religiously, marriage has been defined as a union of a man and a worman. For years this was bashed as archaic and silly. Recently a fight has ensued for same sex to have the same benefits, but the definition is changed. I fully endorse the legal rights (medical, wills, taxes, etc) but the definition, when diluted, changes its meening. Same sex family model might be verbally more accurate. |
økonomien › Likelønn
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, det er for mange andre variabler som utdanning, erfaring og ansiennitet som bestemmer en rettferdig lønn |
Innenrikspolitikk › Våpenkontroll
BS>BS Personlig svarNei |
Kriminalitet › Politiet Body Kameraer
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, dette vil beskytte sikkerheten og rettighetene til politifolk og borgere |
Helsevesen › Drug Pris forordning
BS>BS Personlig svarIt feels like the right thing to say is yes, but you end up with less life saving drugs in the future. Often the initial drugs pave the way for wide scale use later. The government should allow terminal patients to try alternative treatment. From a purely progressive standpoint, we are better off with the status quo, but from a equity stand point people will declare that this is not fair. The idea is that it might be better for everyone to be equally poor off than to have some poor off and some better. |
Helsevesen › Pre-eksisterende forhold
BS>BS Personlig svarThis is one of the few instances where collective support can make our society better. Again a 3rd party disinterested group should receive money from existing healthcare companies. Healthcare companies should not be only able to choose "Healthy" candidates and get huge profits but we also have to heavily subsidize care for others. We need more transparancy in actual medical care in order to be better informed. |
Sosialt › Gun Buyback
BS>BS Personlig svar...Shall not be infringed is as similar to the stance as free speech. As we have seen in the last 2-3 years, Police can be defunded giving way to mobs, and the government can exert way too much control on its population. Guns are not there for target practice and yes the populance can fight a conventional war (see the Ukraine). |
Sosialt › Gender Identity
BS>BS Personlig svarAll people should be treated equally. No special classes or consideration for anyone. |
Sosialt › Kjønnsovergang
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, barn skal ikke få lov til å ta irreversible livsbeslutninger |
Helsevesen › Mental Helse
BS>BS Personlig svarGovernment is rarely the answer. We continue to make zombies out of kids and adults with anti-depressant drugs that the government favors. More work needs to be done. |
Sosialt › Religious Freedom Act
BS>BS Personlig svarThe targeting of a business to promote a social or political goal is infringing on anothers rights. If there are no other options available (thinking doctor being forced to perform a sex reassignment surgery on a child). Would be a case for discussion. Ironically, these suits are not brought against other protected groups Jewish person seeking a passover order from a Muslim Bakery, or a Muslim business providing Transgender reassignment surgery. |
Sosialt › Transgender-idrettsutøvere
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, idrettsutøvere bør konkurrere basert på det biologiske kjønn som er oppført på deres fødselsattest |
Innvandring › Forbud mot muslimske innvandrere
BS>BS Personlig svarThis question is misleading. We should ban immigrants that we cannot vet. This comment is conflated with Muslim nations only because their checks are not reliable and makes for a good political statement. |
Utdannelse › Tilgivelse av studielån
BS>BS Personlig svarWhy does government give the american people the rope in which to hang themselves. It is a shell game. Pay for 40-50 years of our lives in taxes versus 10-15 years in student loans is not a savings. What about those that did not get student loans? Why are college education opportunities getting so expensive. |
Sosialt › Planned Parenthood Funding
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, og regjeringen bør ikke gi midler til noen organisasjoner som utfører aborter |
økonomien › Minstelønn
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, de fleste minstelønnsjobber er ment å utvikle erfaring, ikke støtte en familie |
Innenrikspolitikk › Bevæpnede lærere
BS>BS Personlig svarAny teacher that is willing to, attends extensive training, displays reasonable ability should be allowed to carry. |
miljøet › Klima forandring
BS>BS Personlig svarThe government should not hurt its citizen if other countries citizens are not being targeted. Climate change is an opinion at this point. We have not experienced the hocky stick that Al Gore promised. We have celebrities and presidents buying oceanfront property. The earth goes through cycles long before the industrial revolution. Too much is at stake to base changing society for something that cannot be definitively proven. |
økonomien › Betalt sykefravær
BS>BS Personlig svarIf this type of paid leave is expected, perhaps it can be treated like weekly deduction into an account that a person uses. The problem is that individuals want FREE time off and a company must take money from someone somewhere in order to pay for this. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Narkotikapolitikk
BS>BS Personlig svarPerhaps pot and those with minor crimes related. No to almost anything else unless proscribed by a medical doctor. Do focus on prevention and rehab. Enforce the laws we already have. |
Utenrikspolitikk › Iran
BS>BS Personlig svarExhaust diplomatic options. Excercies sanctions. Support Isreali action (since they are the target of most threats), and avoide action that destabilizes the region. |
økonomien › Skatter
BS>BS Personlig svarStop punishing producers. It is not the rich that pay the bulk of taxes, nor due they have as much wealth as claimed. It is the middle class that pays the taxes and all taxes on the rich end up soaking the middle and lower class while the rich receive favorable consideration from the government. |
Valg › Testing av mental kompetanse
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, og politikere i alle aldre bør kreves for å bestå en mental kompetanseprøve |
Utenrikspolitikk › Obligatorisk militærtjeneste
BS>BS Personlig svarRequire obligated service of some kind. Once they see the pitfall of government they will demand government out of your life. Require a year of service for every year of reduced school. |
Sosialt › Racial Sensitivity Training
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, bare sørg for at det er klare retningslinjer, handlinger og ansvar for diskriminering |
Valg › utenlandske Lobbying
BS>BS Personlig svarNei |
Utdannelse › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
BS>BS Personlig svarThis is a totally biased question. First is, what is critical race theory and what is its purpose. If we teach history, then we are teaching about Slavery, Segregation, the destruction of the black family with broken homes. Telling people of another skin color it is their fault and that they somehow should be punished for this implied benefit is wrong. Raise up the greatness of everyone, not tear down those around us. |
Innvandring › Innvandring
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, de må formelt søke som alle andre nye borger |
Utdannelse › Studentlån
BS>BS Personlig svarAre you kidding me? Schools charge way too much. Interest is only a function of stupid high costs. How about government investigate why the cost of college is going througth the roof? |
Utdannelse › Gratis høyskole for alle
BS>BS Personlig svarAgain, why is Federal Government involved? We as communities should push education but it could be College or trade schools. This should not be a yes or no question. |
Innvandring › Utvisning av kriminelle innvandrere
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
Helsevesen › Marihuana
BS>BS Personlig svarPhased legalization yes. But we need to be prepared for the social impact just like Alcoholism which is often used as an escape. We also need to way to identify intoxication to prevent death and danger on the road and when working. We also need to create a new level of abues programs and education. We could phase in reducing prison population related to Pot, however a 3rd party should be included since a dealer involved in theft or death that has pleaded down to possesion shoul dnot be in the same catagory as a guys busted with it in his possession. |
Sosialt › Hat tale
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, fordi jeg ikke stoler på at myndighetene definerer grensene for hatytringer |
Sosialt › Confederate Flag
BS>BS Personlig svarIt should be voted on. It should be vigorously debated. It should not be based on a judge or a politician or worse a mob. To some it is a symbol of hate and to some it is a symbol of rebellion. So is the American Flag. |
Sosialt › Offentlige mandater
BS>BS Personlig svarNO! The government should stay out of this. Birth control is a choice. There are plenty of options out there without a heavy handed government getting involved. |
Innenrikspolitikk › No-Fly-listen våpenkontroll
BS>BS Personlig svarNeed due process on no-fly list. slippery slope. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Høyesterett Reform
BS>BS Personlig svarEach time the balance of the court shifts the other side cries foul. Members of the court being given position for life helps to prevent strategic influence. When justices fail to step down at a preferrable time to the political climate, they risk impacting the balance for selfish reasons, but it still allows for choices. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Valgfusk
BS>BS Personlig svarMany facets to this. If it was fair and properly administered I think impartial redrawing would be preferred. Generally the side that has the favorable conditions wins and likes the right, and the other dislikes it. |
Sosialt › Kvinner i strid
BS>BS Personlig svarLived this. There are logistics to this that make women in combat less effective (seperate tents, medical, showering, etc). Breakdown in command structure which makes the chain of command less effective. Mixing of Men and Women together results in social problems that breakdown the unit coheasion (Jelousy, pregnancy, harassment, favoritisn etc). Physical limitations (yes some are capable of lifting a 175 pound man and I have seen a few males not capable of the same), but overall there is a difference for combat readiness. Last is the difference between asking to and being forced to. A male can be obligated into a combat role, but a female must seek it and if not would it be OK to force them into a frontline combat role. Much too complicated as long as we have a volunteer army to force this for some kind of theatrics or PR stunt. Real People Die in this expairiment. Perhaps an all female unit? |
Innvandring › Tilbakeholdelse av ulovlige immigranter
BS>BS Personlig svarWe are a nation of laws. This includes federal crimes. We need to be united in proper process. If we turn a blind eye to a broken law that results in tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars of tax money being used without choice in wrong. |
Helsevesen › Medicaid
BS>BS Personlig svarNO. The Federal government is an awful judge of healthcare. They are poor with your money. A person should invest in and be able to use an account to address healthcare. The current system is full of waste fraud and abuse. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Regulering av sosiale medier
BS>BS Personlig svarWho decides what is fake and real? We have seen examples of fake news like Russian Collusion, Hunter Biden laptop, and Hillary Clinton emails receiving different treatment by platforms that have shown to be less that impartial. |
Vitenskap › Obligatoriske vaksinasjoner
BS>BS Personlig svarAny policy that is mandated by the Government is a little scary. If I believe it helps, then I should take it, if I dont then I could have that option. We have people aborting fetuses and label it as reproductive health. Struggling to reconcile this madness. |
Innvandring › Grensesikkerhet
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, og la grensestatene til å styre sin egen sikkerhetspolicy |
Kriminalitet › Private fengsler
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, men de bør være strengt regulert for å hindre misforvaltning og korrupsjon |
Sosialt › Kjønnsmangfold på arbeidsplassen
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, staten bør aldri kreve mangfold hos private bedrifter |
Kriminalitet › Kvalifisert immunitet for politiet
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, og gi mer opplæring og utdannelse for politibetjenter |
miljøet › Alternativ energi
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, og regjeringen bør aldri støtte uprøvd teknologi |
Innvandring › Sanctuary Cities
BS>BS Personlig svarFederal funding should not be a weapon against a state or a city, however we should be able to vote. Federal funding should not be used for non-US citizens. The difficulty is that often those funds can be misused or diverted. |
Innvandring › Helsehjelp til immigranter
BS>BS Personlig svarNo, no, no. Illegal should be treated for immediate healthcare needs, but sould be returned to their contry of origin and follow the proper access that over 1,000,000 do each year. If they purchase healthcare of their own, then yes they can do that. |
Valg › Kampanjemidler
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
Helsevesen › Offentlig helsetjeneste
BS>BS Personlig svarLived it in the military. You wont like it. You lose all choices. Quality and availability decreases. Everyone gets equally poor care. Waste Fraud and Abuse accelerates. Buyer beware. |
Innvandring › Innvandrende arbeidere
BS>BS Personlig svarLegal immigrants need priority. US citizens should be given priority over them. Illegal immigrants should be processed out. These are all the same expectations other countries have and we should be no different. |
miljøet › Alaska Wildlife Refuge
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
Valg › Stemmefusk
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
økonomien › Bedriftsbeskatning
BS>BS Personlig svarLets focus on special favors bestowed upon corporate donations to candidates. Pfizer for Covid Vax, Solar Energy to Solindra, tax breaks to electric car companies. The government is creating guaranteed profits through this methods. Stop adding taxes that get passed on to consumers. |
Sosialt › trygge Spaces
BS>BS Personlig svarOn the one hand you can have violent language and threat of physical force by left leaning groups, but then there is the "Dog whistle" trigger warning related to subtle right leaning tendancies. I think that we are using these as a crutch or as a club to bludgeon the opposition. You sould not be able to have it both ways. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Patriot Act
BS>BS Personlig svarIt was a good initial option. It later fell into abuse of several amendments. |
økonomien › Offentlige utgifter
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, og fjern statsbyråer som er grunnlovsstridige |
Helsevesen › COVID Employment Health Pass
BS>BS Personlig svarAbsolutely NOT. No government involvement in private business. They will simply tie business subsidies or future contracts to agreeing with these government "guidelines", so it wont matter. Government needs to get out of the healthcare business. |
Valg › Minstealder for valgdeltakelse
BS>BS Personlig svarWe have shown that teens cannot make good choices with alcohol until 21. We also do not let early drivers rent a car until 25. Most young voters are not properly informed. Most voters cannot tell you who the VP is, their Congressional Rep, or how many judges are on the SC. I like the Idea of a test or earning citizenship through service to the country, but constitutionally that is not legal so I reluctantly say raise it to 21 same as alcohol. |
Utenrikspolitikk › Israel
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, men respekter Israels suverenitet og ikke dikter hvordan de skal interagere med sine naboer |
Utenrikspolitikk › Ukrainsk forsvarsfinansiering
BS>BS Personlig svarI believe that the US can use this fighting as a proxy war that helps to minimize Russia especially since Russia started this. BUT this is siphoning off our military supplies, it is costing the US tax payer Billions, and the Ukraine was and is a badly corrupt coutry and we may be picking a side that is a problem for us later on like when we backed Afganistan fighting Russia only to then have to fight them ourselves. Beware of unintended consequences. |
Utenrikspolitikk › NATO
BS>BS Personlig svarYes but with some demands that other countries meet their obligations. We are not the worlds police force. |
Innvandring › Border Wall
BS>BS Personlig svarUntil a soverign boarder is recognized and enforced. A wall, electronics, military and diplomatic means. There are billions of people that would escape their lives if they could come here and it is impossible for us to assimilate this many. Better to promote the freedoms we have here elsewhere. |
Innvandring › Immigrantassimilering
BS>BS Personlig svarThere has to be a unifying part of this country. We do need assistance for new immigrants. We can have independant sponsored language assistance, but to have every language offered in schools, 150 different transation and forms, plus a breakdown in the sytem is not good for the country. Subsequent generations need to have english as a primary language. |
Helsevesen › Medicaid arbeidskrav
BS>BS Personlig svarThe easy answer 100% yes with only a very few carveouts allowed. Any exception would require significant approval by a 3rd party. |
Sosialt › Første tillegg
BS>BS Personlig svarNo. It is part of the Judeo Christian influence of the founding fathers. It impacts none of the people and is part of historical tradition. |
Innenrikspolitikk › gun Ansvar
BS>BS Personlig svarWe need to stop blaming the tool. A car is just as dangerous as a gun in the wrong hands. We need to start focusing on society and mental state. I think we should also be able to sue doctors issuing drugs that harm or fail to red flag an individual. |
Kriminalitet › Utbetaler politiet
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, øk finansiering og opplæring for politiavdelinger i miljøer med høyere kriminalitetsrate |
Kriminalitet › Enecelle for Juveniles
BS>BS Personlig svarSome juveniles are as big and dangerous as a full grown man. Others are vulnerable inside of prison. Additionally violent juveniles need seperation from others. |
Innvandring › Dyktige Immigranter
BS>BS Personlig svarOK to increase as long as legal, approved, and properly processed. |
Innvandring › Statsborgerskapsprøve
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, og det bør teste mer enn bare en grunnleggende forståelse |
Kriminalitet › Obligatoriske minimum fengselsstraff
BS>BS Personlig svarYes in cases of violence. Yes in cases related to hard drugs. Yes in cases related to death or bad intent like selling in a school. |
Valg › Stemmerett for utlendinger
BS>BS Personlig svarNei |
Helsevesen › Trygg havn
BS>BS Personlig svarHow does this help? Yes we reduce some drug related deaths but only to help increase and subsidize the proliferation. |
Helsevesen › Medicare narkotika priser
BS>BS Personlig svarPersonal choice is a great influencer. Keep government out. A 3rd party disinterested group should be able to help keep Health services in check though. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Kvotering
BS>BS Personlig svarWe should focus on fair programs. We strip minorities of believing that they fairly earned a position. We descriminate against another group in attempt to level the playing field which is the exact thing we are trying to change. |
Helsevesen › Vaksinemandater for kunder
BS>BS Personlig svarAbsolutely not. A business does not have the medical capabilities of understanding something like this. As the CDC has recently stated, an infected person has just as much immunity to COVID as a vaxed person. Vaccinations are designed to prevent a person from getting a disease, which the current vax does not do. So ultimately we are asking a server to determine a persons ability to take part in society. |
økonomien › Universell borgerlønn
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, dette vil oppmuntre folk til ikke å arbeide, og vil skade økonomisk vekst |
Innenrikspolitikk › Flaggbrenning
BS>BS Personlig svarMy personal opinion is that it should only be burned at retirement. I think people should be allowed to burn it as a symbol if they wish, but I would like to reserve my option to extinguish the fire as well. For environmental concerns. |
økonomien › Velferd
BS>BS Personlig svarFlere, reformer systemet slik at det supplerer arbeidsinntekten fremfor å erstatte den |
Kriminalitet › Demilitariser politiet
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
økonomien › Fagforeninger
BS>BS Personlig svarHjelper, i teorien, men har nylig blitt korrupt og bør få makten sin redusert |
Valg › Kampanjemidler
BS>BS Personlig svarDonations should be capped. Corporations would appear to be influence peddeling (although they usually donte to both in order to secure favors), and unions should not donate if their constituancy does not have a say in where, who, and how much. |
økonomien › Økonomisk stimulering
BS>BS Personlig svarNo. We learn no resiliancy or responsibility. Government action simply delays the effect and we end up worse off in general. If anything we should encourage building up our own individual wealth to weather the storm. |
økonomien › Narkotikatesting av velferdsmottakere
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, test alle som mottar penger fra staten, inkludert ansatte og politikere. |
miljøet › Dakota Tilgang Pipeline
BS>BS Personlig svarNei |
økonomien › Kapitalgevinstskatt
BS>BS Personlig svarIf you have money that has been taxed, then you use it to buy a product that increases, you have no right to take a second bite of it. The government is like a swarm of locust, it will eat whatever it can for no regard of the future and then the entire population will die out. |
Innvandring › Skolepenger for de som kommer fra staten
BS>BS Personlig svarWe need to disincentivize coming to this country via illegal means. Embrace legal immigration. Change the laws if we want to do more as a country. |
Utdannelse › Fellesfag
BS>BS Personlig svarNei |
Helsevesen › Verdens helseorganisasjon
BS>BS Personlig svarThis entity has lost a ton of credibility. There are some good and viable programs. BUT every coutry should contribute the same amount per capita and oversight needs to be strict by a 3rd party. |
miljøet › Oljeboring
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
Utenrikspolitikk › FN
BS>BS Personlig svarYes, and we should make our voices heard but not at the expense of our nations sovereignty. No one world government. |
Helsevesen › Obamacare
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, regjeringen bør ikke være involvert i helsevesenet |
Valg › Innsyn i kandidater
BS>BS Personlig svarOversight from an impartial panel to ensure there is no money from China or Russia or that someone is not gaming the system. The current push is in an effort to smear politicians on both sides. If wrong doing if substantiated, then stiff penalties should be initiated. |
miljøet › Fracking
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
Valg › lobbyister
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
økonomien › overtidsbetaling
BS>BS Personlig svarThis is a symbiotic relationship. If an employee is worth the money the business should pay. If a business wants to keep its employee, they will pay, if a business does not pay, the employee should be free to seek a new better paying job. In a truly capatalistic society, a balance is reached. |
Innenrikspolitikk › Eminent Domain
BS>BS Personlig svarYes, but this has to be a very careful thing. Needs to be reasonable compensation, needs to be public good, needs to be beneficial to community. |
Valg › Post i stemmesedler
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, post i stemmesedler skal bare brukes av velgere som er fysisk ute av stand til å komme seg til et valgsted |
Valg › electoral College
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, men reform slik at stemmer fordeles proporsjonalt i stedet for dagens vinneren tar alt system |
Utenrikspolitikk › Militærforbruk
BS>BS Personlig svarFirst root out waste fraud and abuse. Second root out pork and special favors. Third invest in next generation, like drones, cyber, kinetic weapons, and other technologies. |
Kriminalitet › Kollektive forhandlinger
BS>BS Personlig svarYes, but we need a 3rd party to oversee this. |
miljøet › Dyreforsøk
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, men ikke for kosmetikk |
Vitenskap › Kjernekraft
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
Kriminalitet › Straffer for narkotikahandel
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, men bare hvis de har begått gjentatte forseelser |
Utenrikspolitikk › Tortur
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
Valg › Kriminelle politikere
BS>BS Personlig svarI think that the concern is that this could become a driving force in trying to charge a politician. Not all crimes are the same. I think that this should not be a blanket rule but worth discussing depending on the nature and severity of the infraction. |
Utenrikspolitikk › Utenlandsk bistand
BS>BS Personlig svarSenk, og nekt bistand til land som huser eller fremmer terrorisme |
Helsevesen › VA Privatisering
BS>BS Personlig svarI lived Military healthcare for 4 years. Good product but no way is it a standard we need to go to. No choice, no urgency, give Vets a medical card that assists with outside resources and have a VA that is there as a safety net. |
Utdannelse › Skolekuponger
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
Utenrikspolitikk › Droner
BS>BS Personlig svarThe easy answer is yes, but with some concern about impact of extra national involvement in a soverign country. |
Vitenskap › GMO-merker
BS>BS Personlig svarWe just pumped the population of the country with exparimental RNA drugs that we have not long term history and we are concerned about genetically modified crops that make them drought resistant, pest resistant, and helps to feed the billions of the people on this planet. Am I the only person that does not see the folly? |
Kriminalitet › Overbefolkning av fengsler
BS>BS Personlig svarThis cant be a plead down case. The offender needs to be supervised. The offender needs to pay back society for their level of transgression. Education, training, and rehab needs to be a requirement. |
Utdannelse › Universal Pre-K
BS>BS Personlig svarWhat in the world is the Federal government doing being involved in preschool? This is a matter for individuals and local government. Offer vouchers if we want. |
bolig › Leirer for hjemløse
BS>BS Personlig svarMy opinion is to get them into shelter, rehab. If they choose elsewhere, they should not be forced, but existing laws should not be broken to allow illegal activity especially near schools, libraries, playgrounds etc. Once actions become too much independant agencies can assume a role, but should not be up to the government. Further interations should be legal in action and can then become criminal. |
Transport › Kollektiv transport
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, og vi burde privatisere flere offentlige transporttjenester |
Utenrikspolitikk › Ukraina og Nato
BS>BS Personlig svarNot simple black and white. Ukraine needs to rid itself of corruption. It needs to repay the funds it has received, and it has to live up to its commitments. |
Innvandring › Dobbelt statsborgerskap
BS>BS Personlig svarNei |
økonomien › Estate Tax
BS>BS Personlig svarYes, and government should never steal money from anyone. Individuals have the natural right to rule themselves, make their own choices, and choose their own lifestyles. |
Kriminalitet › Stemmerett for kriminelle
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, men kun etter fullført straff og prøveløslatelse |
miljøet › Plastproduktforbud
BS>BS Personlig svarI beleive that we all should treat the earth in a good way. Limiting how we live and survive in an effort to protect the planet if folly. |
Utenrikspolitikk › Terrorisme
BS>BS Personlig svarNei |
Nasjonal sikkerhet › Militær kongressens godkjenning
BS>BS Personlig svarImmediate response should be possible by the president. Continued pursuit needs congressional approval. |
miljøet › Paris klimaavtale
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, til andre land holdes til de samme standardene |
økonomien › Tekniske monopoler
BS>BS Personlig svarAmazon is already killing the local business. Facebook is no longer working as an impartial messaging platform, and Google is selling our data and manipulating social control. They also have too much power and can gravely impact any chance at competition. They also have too much government influence on policy. |
Helsevesen › Medisinsk konsensus
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, vitenskapelig konsensus kan raskt endre seg og pasienter bør få prøve ukonvensjonelle ideer |
Nasjonal sikkerhet › Attentater i utlandet
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, men kun dersom det finnes ubestridelige bevis på at de har utført et angrep på landet vårt |
Utenrikspolitikk › NATO
BS>BS Personlig svarNei |
Vitenskap › Romutforsking
BS>BS Personlig svarWe need to continue our progress. IF you believe that the world is going to be uninhabitable and we can somehow migrate to Mars and terraform it versus seeking improvement in Earth, then having a rational conversation is not possible. |
Utdannelse › Åpne for Learning Recovery Benefit Program
BS>BS Personlig svarAgain, we should be teaching resiliancy. NOT bailouts. As a community we should be empowering every person with freedom to make choices that benefit them. Stop believing that we cannot do for ourselves. |
økonomien › NAFTA
BS>BS Personlig svarYes, but renegotiate NAFTA to be more fair |
Nasjonal sikkerhet › Meksikanske narkotikakarteller
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
økonomien › Utenlands bankbruk
BS>BS Personlig svarCitizens should be allowed to choose. They should not be bailed out when that money is lost due to poor judgement and there is no FDIC in this case. Should the purpose be to specifically skip on taxes, then we can evaluate that individually. |
Utenrikspolitikk › India Arms
BS>BS Personlig svarSince we pulled out of Afganistan we lost a strategic location in the region. India is a democratic country wedged in the middle of many countries that have the potential to become unstable. |
Utenrikspolitikk › NSA-overvåkning
BS>BS Personlig svarNei |
Utenrikspolitikk › Cuba
BS>BS Personlig svarIf the purpose gives power to the people, if it weakens the communist strangle hold on its people, if the money does not go into government hands, and it provides a positive experience for the people that have been fed propoganda, then yes. Open up Cuba. |
miljøet › Ladestasjoner for elektriske kjøretøy
BS>BS Personlig svarNei, og jeg er skeptisk til elbilenes levedyktighet |
Utenrikspolitikk › Jerusalem
BS>BS Personlig svarJa |
Utdannelse › Skoletransport
BS>BS Personlig svarBad question. Are we talking parents? This is being used to hammer parents that home school. We might benefit more from flexibility. |
økonomien › Pensjonsreform
BS>BS Personlig svarPension plans should be phased out. Their funds too often are badly managed and run out. People are living longer and the ability to collect at 62 is too early. These plans are too often used as a wedge when it comes to free choice. |
miljøet › Bedriftsbidrag
BS>BS Personlig svarJa, så lenge skatteinntektene til slutt vil overstige skatteincitamenter |
Utenrikspolitikk › F-35
BS>BS Personlig svarWe do need a 5th gen fighter. If we speed R&D on 6th Gen fighter AND Drones with AI infused tech then we can phase out our pilots and rely on more and more tech to fight out battles. |
Her er hvordan du sammenligner deg med denne velgeren på populære politiske temaer.
Du side litt mot "sikkerhet", noe som betyr at du more often tror at regjeringen bør gjøre alt innenfor sin makt for å sikre borgernes sikkerhet. Dette temaet er viktigst for deg.
Du er en sentrist på venstrefløjen og høyreflaksproblemer. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du er en senter for autoritære og libertariske problemer. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du er en sentralist på demokratisk sosialisme og kapitalismespørsmål. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du side litt mot "nasjonalisme", noe som betyr at du more often støtter politikk som prioriterer våre nasjoners interesser over andre. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du er en centrist på politisk feil og politisk korrekte problemer. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du er en senter for unilateralisme og multilaterale spørsmål. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du side litt mot "religiøse", noe som betyr at du more often støtter politikk som gjenspeiler religiøse verdier og prinsipper. Dette temaet er mer viktig for deg.
Du side moderat mot "proteksjonisme", noe som betyr at du tror globaliseringen er skadelig for arbeidets sikkerhet, kompensasjon, miljø og levestandard. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du side litt mot "deregulering", noe som betyr at du more often tror at regjeringen regulerer innovasjon og økonomisk velstand. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du er en senter for assimilering og multikulturalisme problemer. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du er en sentralist på pacifisme og militarisme problemer. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du er en centrist på tradisjonelle og progressive problemer. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du er en centrist på isolasjonisme og imperialisme problemer. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du er en sentrist på individualisme og kollektivisme problemer. Dette temaet er noe viktig for deg.
Du sitter litt mot "desentralisering", noe som betyr at du more often tror at administrativ makt og beslutningsprosesser skal håndteres på lokalt nivå og tjene det beste for lokalsamfunnet. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Du er en centrist på øm og tøffe problemer. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Du er en sentralist på små regjeringer og store regjeringsproblemer. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Du er en sentralist på keynesianske og laissez-faire-problemer. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Du er en senter for antropocentrisme og miljøhensyn. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Du er en sentrist på spørsmål om meritokrati og demokrati. Dette temaet er bare mindre viktig for deg.
Her er hvor enig du er med denne velgeren i hvert emne.
Basert på 18 spørsmål som er rangert mer viktigst for deg.
Basert på 15 spørsmål som er rangert mer viktigst for deg.
Basert på 14 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 12 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 12 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 11 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 10 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 18 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 11 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 4 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 18 spørsmål som er rangert litt viktigst for deg.
Basert på 3 spørsmål som er rangert mindre viktigst for deg.
Basert på 1 spørsmål som er rangert mindre viktigst for deg.
Basert på 1 spørsmål som er rangert mindre viktigst for deg.
Her er hvordan du sammenligner med denne velgeren på den tradisjonelle ideologiske aksen.
iSideWith.com er verdens mest populære stemmeguide for innbyggere for å finne informasjon om valg, politiske partier, kandidater, stemmedistrikter og populære politiske spørsmål i landet deres. Vi er uavhengige og ikke tilknyttet noen investorer, aksjonærer, politiske partier eller interessegrupper.
Jeg forstår at ved å sende inn e-postadressen min kan iSideWith.com sende meg viktige varsler via e-post. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. Alle rettigheter forbeholdt. Bruk av dette nettstedet innebærer aksept av vår brukeravtale og personvernerklæring . iSideWith.com kan tjene en del av salget fra produkter som er kjøpt gjennom nettstedet vårt som en del av våre tilknyttede partnerskap med forhandlere. Materialet på dette nettstedet kan ikke reproduseres, distribueres, overføres, bufres eller på annen måte brukes, unntatt med skriftlig tillatelse fra iSideWith.com.