Du støtter bruk av hydraulisk fracking å hente ut olje og gassressurser på?

Hvis en venn hevdet at fracking er avgjørende for økonomisk vekst, hvordan ville du reagert, både med tanke på miljøet og jobbskapingen?

Tror du teknologiske fremskritt kan gjøre fracking tryggere og mer miljøvennlig, eller bør vi fokusere på alternative ressurser?

Hva er en endring du ville vært villig til å gjøre i din nåværende livsstil hvis det innebar å redusere de negative effektene av energiutvinning?

Hvis du måtte velge mellom lavere energikostnader eller miljøvern, hva ville du valgt, og hva er grunnlaget for avgjørelsen din?

Hvordan ser du for deg den ideelle energifremtiden, og hvilken rolle spiller ikke-fornybar energi i den visjonen?

Med tanke på den globale etterspørselen etter energi, hvordan balanserer du behovet for olje og gass med potensiell risiko for miljøet?

Hvilke verdier eller prioriteringer mener du bør lede våre energiproduksjonsvalg i møte med klimaendringer og hvorfor?

Har du eller noen du kjenner opplevd noen direkte påvirkning fra fracking, og i så fall hva var den påvirkningen?

Hvordan ville du følt om et fracking-nettsted ble opprettet i nærheten av samfunnet ditt, og hvilke bekymringer eller fordeler du tenker på?

Yes, but be smart about it- I.E. Take into consideration where you will be fracking and if it will affect peoples homes, water, health and overall well being and quality of living

I support hydraulic fracking in the U.S., ONLY, if it is AMERICAN OWNED interests doing it. I am against foreign corps. (the Chinese) performing this here.

In a safer form, not in its current poisonous form. We shouldn't be leaving buried chemicals in the ground that will eventually seep into water supplies. In fact, why are they using the poisonous chemicals that they use now anyways, when they have safer and more efficient extraction methods?

Yes, but there needs to be verifiable evidence that it does not harm the ground water sources before it can be used

Concerns are based on sound evidence. Companies need to be controlled in their pursuit of oil at the expense of h2o and peoples health.

Yes, with greatly increased oversight but while also pursing renewable sources of energy such as solar, hydro, and wind power.

Yes but it needs to be done responsibly. Also there should be ongoing monitoring of its effects on the earth and environment. Again, oil is a finite commodity so look for alternative sources of energy.

I believe it is important for both our economy and current country affairs to continue to extract resources to fuel production and economy. However, fracking may not be the best choice. If it is the best choice for certain circumstances and it is needed to keep a healthy economy I believe it should be used. I am all for protecting the environment but I also recognize the need for natural resources and believe God gave us this earth to utilize for our benefit and well being. We should not intentionally destroy nature though.

Increase overesight, and scientific monitoring of fracking to determine if the process endangers water supplies, decreases ground stability, or has other harmful environmental effects.

Some fracking is perfectly harmless, and helpful. It's not a black and white issue, there are degrees of harm done, including none at all.

Fracking should be studied more for it's long term effects. The oil industry has not proved it is environmentally sound. Lighting tap water on fire says something is amiss. Ground water is more important.