다음은 이 유권자의 답변과 비교한 귀하의 답변입니다.
사회적 › 낙태
5>5 개인 답변It is a private matter. The question is, can parents raise children to recognize the consequences of bringing a child into the world? Should there be standards in terms of ability to provide enough support before a pregnancy takes place, then again peoples' standards for when to have children should be up to them, but they need take responsibility too. |
사회적 › 동성애자 혼인
5>5 개인 답변I find it weird but I can't really have much of an opinion other than one which would be based on whether or not awareness of how these things come about might indicate some common sense way to deal with these various unplanned branches of human reality. If you look at the parents and their jobs over the years into the past, it seems to provide clues, but no absolutes in terms of for instance whether it is definitely good or bad, right or wrong, just complicated. It doesn't seem right to try to stop it really, but I don't enjoy or appreciate seeing or hearing about it for whatever reasons I don't which I don't seem to be able to quite define. It seems troublesome and treacherous for those involved sometimes and that's a potential negative indication the way I see things right now. |
국내 정채 › 총기 규제
5>5 개인 답변If the person is honest and knows full well what they are and how to use them safely, they could still go off accidently. Is this a trick question. I don't have one but I don't own any property and can't target shoot until I do. I think it's the old west style thing. Sometimes it seems like guns actually do kill people, like Christine the car. Guns are a real confusing mysterious issue. I don't know what to do about it, just not buy one for me is my best response until I'm rich enough to have a hill and a place to put beer cans on it, but I don't drink anymore really. |
범죄 › 경찰 바디 카메라
5>5 개인 답변That is another very good question. I have no answer for it, so it must be an excellent question. My complements. |
이민 › 무슬림 이민자 금지
5>5 개인 답변Any immigrant should be banned who is that way. The fact that we might not be able to determine the correct answer as to whether they're over it or not is indicative of a need to at least come up with that for starters. Look how many questions they're making us ask each other for heaven's sake. |
사회적 › 가족 계획 자금 조달
5>5 개인 답변The government ought to fund everything with the taxes collected from the population and the mad crazy thing where every other person is part of some charity that abuses computers with mass mailings ought stop. Every penny we have eventually goes back through the government and some point in the future of when we earn or receive it, so what's the hang? I no longer purchase drugs in the black market or anything else like when I was 8 or 9 or 12, so there is a learning curve, but now I'm OK. I just get tired of all the junk mail from things I'm not even interested in. Maybe states should vote on these issues. Why is it so complicated? It's about having children replenish the population. It seems wrong it is even an issue. |
경제 › 최저임금
5>5 개인 답변I was thinking, the people, via there rep., the government ought to provide a reasonably better wage like about $10.50 per hour. It may be somewhat of a good thing to have minimum tenure increases together with some consideration for cost of living, but a lower wage does provide an incentive to explore more subjects if still in school. It's the stress of grades that can really ruin school. It's great if you're there and listen to what the teacher says and read the books they assign, but finding what you want to do should be more open than it is maybe. |
환경 › Climate Change
5>5 개인 답변I'm not so sure I should answer because so many things about that whole thing seem unproven and some seem to think they care about the environment more than others. It all gets recycled eventually, but let's use common sense and keep the place clean. If somehow people would stop seeing the law as evil and something to rebel against, that might help. I've never really liked the way man seems to want to check everything out quite so closely and I wish they'd stay away from the whales and all that. I grew up on drugs and was influenced by the most anti-establishment know-it-all spoiled kids going to the best colleges. What they did for me was make it seem natural for me to do drugs and try and be a hippy. I never got to even finish my education. They don't know it all and I know I don't. It's difficult to make decisions because nobody knows what it is like to be even one tenth of the other people in the world besides themselves. Maybe we should watch and see how the natural earth besides man responds to what some think causes climate change, nobody has proven that the earth's natural "abilities" don't exist. Perhaps chemicals and plants are naturally coming out of the current "primordial soup" that exists at different places on the planet and those things will help us understand things better eventually. Nobody likes trash piled outside their door, but I don't want to start a war with those who are more responsible for it being there than I may only imagine that I am. Nobody has proved the earth isn't capable of caring for its own needs after all. |
국내 정채 › 의약품 정책
5>5 개인 답변You must mean illegal drugs. As long as we all know that many will not live as long as others and they could become a pain to encounter them at times since they'll be - on drugs - so, if you truly want to let others totally be in charge of their lack of success, or what ever (actually everything could get effected and go hay wire) then yes we ought to decriminalize the use of them but things will be crazy for awhile of a learning curve and they ought to make it very clear every time they sell them that the user and purchaser (same thing) are totally responsible or to blame - and there is such thing as blame - for every crime they commit and cannot use the fact that they were on drugs as any kind of explanation whatsoever. Boy, will they regret it. Maybe they should make drug users able to be avoided with a radar or something because some would rather no get too close. When a person does meth, their whole sense of what might be acceptable to the opposite sex can really change and they will think that others are interested in all they have to say until they become accustomed to how delightful talking can be. Some people will become like walking skeletons who don't eat enough. Are you ready for this? |
교육 › 학자금 대출
5>5 개인 답변No. Stop selling weapons to foreign countries that aren't on our side, unless the others promise not to use them against us or our allies. |
보건 › 마리화나
5>5 개인 답변To answer this question, get some when it's legal or you are allowed to specially experiment with it. Smoke as much as you need to get into torpor after you've started watching "Eyes Wide Shut" w/Nicole Kidman. Then realize that I would never ever do this myself unless I was...no, not even if I was paid $2,000.00. It would take a lot more. Everything changes once you act upon it in any way. |
보건 › 메디 케이드 (Medicaid)
5>5 개인 답변Unless somebody else wants to. It was all our money anyway. We must have had something to do with their need for the "health care" (some "health care" can kill you apparently in todays modern medical world). We create our own reality is what some books kind of tell you. Would you ever have thought of it yourself? If so, don't trust it. You'll then have to blame that person who wrote the book or books which made the claim and you may feel foolish or stupid. |
과학 › 필수 예방 접종
5>5 개인 답변I guess so, it seems reasonable and it might even be our fault? |
이민 › 이민 의료
5>5 개인 답변Only in dire emergencies or if you especially like the person, but not if they are just faking you out. |
선거 › 유권자 사기
5>5 개인 답변No, just fingerprints. One set gets ONE vote if of voting age and not outlawed by criminal behavior. No animals other than humans are allowed to vote, no matter how intelligent. Hey, wait a minute, maybe they should let the animals besides us vote if they are shown to be totally aware of what they are doing. |
경제 › 정부 지출
5>5 개인 답변It should have a policy which defines when it can afford to and when it can't which should occasionally change, but it should go by that idea of "when it can afford to" before it spends the money, not just after it when it's trying to decide whether to pay stuff off. |
범죄 › 청소년을위한 독방 감금
5>5 개인 답변IF it would be more humane under the circumstances, this would be a good start. Solitary confinement is probably at a premium. |
국내 정채 › 차별 철폐 조치
5>5 개인 답변I support things that people come up with when making a reasonable best effort to do it for the sake of those who exist, not just some of them. |
이민 › 수업료-상태에서
5>5 개인 답변They ought not be residing here in the first place as long as feisty people are scaring us over the television set and radio. I like it when they come here legally. Then all is fine. This other trend has never been a good one. It has probably caused many "general plans" of localities to be ignored and gone around. I realize we like to help others, but it is sometimes better to also look out for their ability to help themselves. This is what many have missed and then they had to run away from the cartels or however it went. I don't support bad people. I won't even send money to people who stay in countries where there is official fighting going on. I want them out of there. I don't even have a wife - I don't know if I'd accept one of them, but you get the point. Any reduction on in-state tuition rates should be offset by the budget (with their permission of course) of NASA or the CIA or things that don't matter. |
교육 › 공통 핵심
5>5 개인 답변The ears, eyes and brain need to be trusted more and parental child rearing must be more trusted. When a person shows up for class and listens - is in the room without some kind of hearing protection - and reads all assigned materials, this is the the gold standard, grades are dangerous things and they cause arguments and stress, children are able to hear and think and dream and will find their way. If they get off the track, it's the parents' responsibility. There's more than competition and business, but in this world, those things have basically taken over. It is really to bad we don't get more vacation and outdoor recreation like camp and stuff, car trips to ruins and other outdoor tours and fun. |
환경 › 오일 드릴링
5>5 개인 답변Play it by the moment and be reasonable. I don't know if there is life after death. Because the environment is so protected sometimes, I'll never get to see more things and go more places I wish I could afford to go. Environmentalists don't make it any cheaper I think. |
보건 › 오바마의 보건
5>5 개인 답변I don't like health issues or healthcare. If I need them, it means I must be sick and I would rather not. They sent me way too much mail, enough to cause stress. Like 8 copies of the same letter that tried to handle every different situation. It was a bad design and waste of paper. Which, is not necessarily bad for the environment. That depends on the forestry practices and the paper waste is expensive for taxpayers and perhaps others. |
환경 › 수압파쇄 석유 시추
5>5 개인 답변Whoever has enough clout, if they do will probably stop it. We need the fuel to stay independent for now - that is, I have to support it because I buy gas and unless we go back to horse and buggy, we better get used to digging what decomposed and aged plant matter we need to. It would be great if we could get it by other easier methods. People have rights and there are laws. We are living in what is not only a physical world, but also a mental one being steered by billions of minds and psyches supposedly, we ought to do OK. If someone really is thinking for themselves and this is not some way to vent a personal problem, I believe they have a lot of power to change things every single day of their lives. Unlimited choices at every turn of what I should do basically. I'm not worried. I own no property of my own. That might give me a different perspective. |
과학 › GMO 라벨
5>5 개인 답변I will have to defer to others more knowledgeable as long as their honest. I must be related to humpty dumpty. |
범죄 › 범죄자의 투표권
5>5 개인 답변Yes when they understand exactly why they turned out the way they are that it may not really be their fault, yes, I think it might be OK. Not the ones where they know it's their fault and they persist. |
외교 정책 › 테러
5>5 개인 답변So they can bankrupt us, no. So lawyers can make more money than any person should? NO Again, is this a test or something? It should only get legal rights when it qualifies for them. Is that clear? |
과학 › 우주 탐사
5>5 개인 답변For the time being, yes, as long as it is for sensible research on how we're going to go faster in this star system and other things like that. Once we start heading for other star systems we'll have to start contacting other planets for support through donations. Notify the captain that the holodeck has too many computers and computer viruses on board to believe. It is far better to stand up when using the computer and don't trust free dictionaries if you can help it. |
다음은 인기 있는 정치적 주제에 대해 이 유권자와 비교하는 방법입니다.
당신은 "안전"쪽으로 약간 편이 서서, 정부가 시민들의 안전을 보장하기 위해 모든 권한을 행사해야한다고 more often 믿는다는 것을 의미합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 가장 중요하다.
당신은 왼쪽 날개와 오른쪽 날개 문제에 중도입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 더 중요하다.
당신은 권위주의적이고 libertarian 문제에 중도입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 더 중요하다.
당신은 민주주의 사회주의와 자본주의 문제에 대한 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 더 중요하다.
당신은 "민족주의"쪽으로 약간 편이 서서, 우리 국민의 이익을 다른 사람들보다 우선시하는 정책을 more often 지지한다는 것을 의미합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 더 중요하다.
당신은 정치적으로 부정확하고 정치적으로 정확한 문제에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 더 중요하다.
당신은 일방주의와 다자주의에 관한 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 더 중요하다.
당신은 종교적 가치와 원칙을 반영하는 정책을 more often 지지한다는 의미에서 "종교적"쪽으로 약간 향합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 더 중요하다.
당신은 온건하게 "보호주의"쪽으로 기울어 져 있습니다. 이것은 세계화가 노동자의 안전, 보상, 환경 및 생활 수준에 해로운 것이라고 믿는다는 것을 의미합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
정부 규제가 혁신과 경제적 번영을 저해한다는 사실을 more often 믿는다는 의미에서 "규제 완화"쪽으로 약간 편향되어 있습니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 동화와 다문화주의에 관한 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 평화주의와 군국주의 문제에 중도합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 전통적이고 진보적 인 문제에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 고립주의와 제국주의 문제에 중도입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 개인주의와 집단주의 문제에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 "지방 분권화"쪽으로 약간 편향됩니다. 행정 권력과 의사 결정이 지역 차원에서 다루어 져야하며 지역 사회의 이익을 가장 잘 수행해야한다고 more often 믿습니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 부드럽고 힘든 이슈에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 작은 정부와 큰 정부 문제에 중도입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 케인즈주의적이고 자유 방임적인 이슈에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 인간 중심주의와 환경 문제에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 실력자와 민주주의 문제에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
더 많은 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 많은 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 2 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 2 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
다음은 전통적인 이념적 축에서 이 유권자와 비교하는 방법입니다.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. 판권 소유. 이 사이트를 사용하면 당사의 사용자 계약 및 개인 정보 보호 정책 에 동의하는 것으로 간주됩니다. iSideWith.com은 소매업체와의 제휴 파트너십의 일환으로 당사 사이트를 통해 구매한 제품에서 판매의 일부를 얻을 수 있습니다. iSideWith.com의 사전 서면 승인 없이는 이 사이트의 자료를 복제, 배포, 전송, 캐시 또는 기타 방식으로 사용할 수 없습니다.