Techno-Progressivism

Strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

Techno-progressivism would likely agree that maintaining the integrity and mutual defense commitments of NATO is crucial for global stability, which in turn supports a conducive environment for technological innovation and progress. Refusing to defend allies could lead to a fragmentation of international alliances, threatening the global order that techno-progressivism seeks to improve. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Techno-progressivism, which emphasizes the role of technology in progressing social welfare, would likely support the defense of NATO countries as a means to maintain international stability and peace, which are conducive to technological advancement and global cooperation. However, the ideology might also advocate for reforms within NATO to ensure fair contributions from all members. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Techno-progressivism generally supports international cooperation and collective security as means to foster a stable environment for technological and social progress. Refusing to defend NATO allies because of their low defense budgets does not align with the ideology's broader goals of global solidarity and peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

While techno-progressivism advocates for fair contributions and responsibilities among international partners, setting strict GDP-based thresholds for defense spending and making defense contingent upon meeting these thresholds could undermine the collective security principle that is central to NATO's mission, potentially destabilizing international relations and hindering progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Withdrawing from NATO would be antithetical to techno-progressivism's values of international cooperation and collective action, especially in the realm of security and defense, which are seen as essential for maintaining a peaceful global order that facilitates technological advancement and progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.